Suppr超能文献

七鳃鳗脊髓诱发癫痫活动期间网状脊髓轴突的持续去极化电位

Sustained depolarizing potentials in reticulospinal axons during evoked seizure activity in lamprey spinal cord.

作者信息

Matthews G, Wickelgren W O

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1978 Mar;41(2):384-93. doi: 10.1152/jn.1978.41.2.384.

Abstract
  1. Intracellular recordings were made from lamprey reticulospinal axons (Müller axons) during seizures evoked by electrical stimulation of the isolated spinal cord in saline containing either 0 Cl or 1 mM picrotoxin. The seizures had tonic and clonic-phases similar to ictal seizures in mammalian brain. 2. During seizures Müller axons were depolarized by 10-15 mV. These seizure-depolarizations were not due to any direct effect of the evoking stimulus on the Müller axons themselves nor were they initiated by an accumulation or extracellular potassium. 3. A decrease in axonal input resistance occurred during a seizure-depolarization. Also, the amplitude of a seizure-depolarization was decreased by depolarizing the axon 5-15 mV with injected current. Further, hyperpolarizing the axon increased the amplitude of the seizure-depolarization, but the growth flattened out beyond 30-40 mV of hyperpolarization. The decrease in input resistance during the seizure-depolarization and the dependence of the response amplitude on axonal membrane potential suggested that the seizure-depolarization was an excitatory synaptic potential. However, the failure of the seizure-depolarization amplitude to continue to grow at membrane potentials greater than 30 mV negative to the resting potential was not consistent with this interpretation. 4. A synaptic conductance change as the cause of the seizure-depolarization was ruled out by setting the axonal membrane potential at different levels with injected current and monitoring the input resistance of the axon before and during seizure-depolarizations. It was found that no change in input resistance occurred during the seizure-depolarization when the axon was hyperpolarized more than approximately 30 mV, the same potential at which the growth in the response amplitude ceased. From analysis of these data and the passive current-voltage properties of Müller axons it is concluded that the seizure-depolarization is not a chemical synaptic potential, but rather the result of the passive injection of depolarizing current into the axons. 5. The source of the depolarizing current which flows into Müller axons during seizures is probably paroxysmal action-potential activity in spinal motoneurons and interneurons, many of which are electrically coupled to Müller axons.
摘要
  1. 在含有0 Cl或1 mM苦味毒的盐溶液中,对分离的脊髓进行电刺激诱发癫痫发作时,从七鳃鳗的网状脊髓轴突(米勒轴突)进行细胞内记录。这些癫痫发作具有类似于哺乳动物脑内发作性癫痫的强直期和阵挛期。2. 在癫痫发作期间,米勒轴突去极化10 - 15 mV。这些癫痫发作去极化并非由于诱发刺激对米勒轴突本身的任何直接作用,也不是由细胞外钾的积累引发的。3. 在癫痫发作去极化期间,轴突输入电阻降低。此外,通过注入电流使轴突去极化5 - 15 mV会降低癫痫发作去极化的幅度。此外,使轴突超极化会增加癫痫发作去极化的幅度,但超极化超过30 - 40 mV后这种增长趋于平稳。癫痫发作去极化期间输入电阻的降低以及反应幅度对轴突膜电位的依赖性表明癫痫发作去极化是一种兴奋性突触电位。然而,癫痫发作去极化幅度在膜电位比静息电位负30 mV以上时未能继续增长,这与该解释不一致。4. 通过注入电流将轴突膜电位设置在不同水平,并在癫痫发作去极化之前和期间监测轴突的输入电阻,排除了突触电导变化是癫痫发作去极化原因的可能性。结果发现,当轴突超极化超过约30 mV时,癫痫发作去极化期间输入电阻没有变化,而这个电位正是反应幅度增长停止的电位。根据这些数据分析以及米勒轴突的被动电流 - 电压特性得出结论,癫痫发作去极化不是化学突触电位,而是去极化电流被动注入轴突的结果。5. 在癫痫发作期间流入米勒轴突的去极化电流的来源可能是脊髓运动神经元和中间神经元的阵发性动作电位活动,其中许多与米勒轴突电耦合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验