Suppr超能文献

运动诱发室性心律失常在稳定型冠状动脉疾病中的意义:一项冠状动脉手术研究项目

Significance of exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmia in stable coronary artery disease: a coronary artery surgery study project.

作者信息

Sami M, Chaitman B, Fisher L, Holmes D, Fray D, Alderman E

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1984 Dec 1;54(10):1182-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(84)80064-8.

Abstract

This retrospective study examines the prognostic significance of exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmia in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) who were included in the multicenter patient registry of the Coronary Artery Surgery Study. The population is composed of 1,486 patients selected from 1975 to 1979 and followed an average of 4.3 years. All underwent a standard Bruce exercise test and had CAD by cardiac catheterization at entry. Patients were classified into group I or II depending on whether they had minimal or significant CAD. (Significant CAD was defined as 70% or greater diameter reduction in any major coronary artery or 50% or greater narrowing in the left main artery.) They were further subclassified into groups A or B depending on whether or not they had exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmia. Groups IA (16 patients) and IB (229 patients) had similar clinical and angiographic characteristics except for the average ejection fraction (EF), which was 50% for group IA and 64% for group IB (p less than 0.05). Group IIA (130 patients) had a higher prevalence of previous myocardial infarction, a lower mean EF and a higher proportion of patients with at least 2 coronary arteries significantly narrowed than group IIB (1,111 patients). The 5-year event-free survival was not influenced by the presence of exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmia; it was 76 and 88% in groups IA and IB, respectively (difference not significant), and 71 and 76% in groups IIA and IIB, respectively (difference not significant).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

这项回顾性研究探讨了运动诱发室性心律失常在稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中的预后意义,这些患者纳入了冠状动脉外科研究的多中心患者登记系统。研究人群包括1975年至1979年间选取的1486例患者,平均随访4.3年。所有患者均接受了标准的布鲁斯运动试验,入组时经心导管检查确诊为CAD。根据CAD程度轻微或严重,患者被分为I组或II组。(严重CAD定义为任何主要冠状动脉直径减少70%或以上,或左主干动脉狭窄50%或以上。)根据是否有运动诱发室性心律失常,他们进一步分为A组或B组。IA组(16例患者)和IB组(229例患者)除平均射血分数(EF)外,临床和血管造影特征相似,IA组平均EF为50%,IB组为64%(p<0.05)。IIA组(130例患者)既往心肌梗死患病率较高,平均EF较低,至少2支冠状动脉严重狭窄的患者比例高于IIB组(1111例患者)。5年无事件生存率不受运动诱发室性心律失常的影响;IA组和IB组分别为76%和88%(差异无统计学意义),IIA组和IIB组分别为71%和76%(差异无统计学意义)。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验