Ebert T J, Hayes J J, Ceschi J, Kotrly K J, van Brederode J, Smith J J
Am J Physiol. 1984 Dec;247(6 Pt 2):H1013-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1984.247.6.H1013.
Bolus intravenous injection of an alpha-agonist is a widely accepted method used for studying baroreceptor function. However, the method is invasive, multiple baroreceptor regions are stimulated, and there are diverse direct effects of these pharmacologic agents, e.g., direct effects on the carotid sinus region. A recently described noninvasive neck suction technique may be highly specific for assessing the carotid sinus to sinoatrial node baroreflex. We compared neck suction-derived baroslopes with those obtained from the standard, invasive phenylephrine infusion method. These techniques were applied to 15 adult volunteers while awake and during 1.34 and 2% isoflurane anesthesia. The correlation coefficients between the two methods were 0.74 (P = 0.002) in awake subjects and 0.75 (P = 0.001) overall. The neck suction method of repetitive, ramped carotid stimuli yielded results that were qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those of the standard phenylephrine method. The neck suction method is simple, noninvasive, and can be repeated at frequent intervals. This method may be highly specific for determining carotid baroreceptor-cardiac reflex physiology in humans.
静脉推注α-激动剂是一种广泛接受的用于研究压力感受器功能的方法。然而,该方法具有侵入性,多个压力感受器区域会受到刺激,并且这些药物制剂存在多种直接作用,例如对颈动脉窦区域的直接作用。最近描述的一种无创颈部吸引技术可能对评估颈动脉窦至窦房结压力反射具有高度特异性。我们将颈部吸引得出的压力斜率与通过标准的有创去氧肾上腺素输注方法获得的压力斜率进行了比较。这些技术应用于15名成年志愿者,分别在其清醒状态以及处于1.34%和2%异氟烷麻醉状态下。两种方法之间的相关系数在清醒受试者中为0.74(P = 0.002),总体上为0.75(P = 0.001)。重复性斜坡式颈动脉刺激的颈部吸引方法得出的结果在定性和定量方面与标准去氧肾上腺素方法的结果相似。颈部吸引方法简单、无创,并且可以频繁重复。该方法可能对确定人类颈动脉压力感受器-心脏反射生理学具有高度特异性。