确定控尿区技术的比较。

Comparison of techniques to determine continence zone.

作者信息

Toguri A G, Wood M M, Churchill B M, Schillinger J F

出版信息

J Urol. 1978 Apr;119(4):541-2. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)57542-4.

Abstract

The urethral pressure profiles for 36 patients were analyzed specifically for continence zone by 3 techniques: 1) triangle, 2) planimeter and 3) weight. Graphically, the best agreement was between the weight and planimetry methods but, statistically, there was a significant difference among techniques except for the subgroup that had the smallest continence area.

摘要

采用三种技术对36例患者的尿道压力分布进行了专门的控尿区分析：1）三角形法、2）求积仪法和3）重量法。从图形上看，重量法和求积仪法之间的一致性最佳，但在统计学上，除了控尿面积最小的亚组外，各技术之间存在显著差异。