Eff J, Bratnick J, Zisblatt M, Vukovich R A, Neiss E
Clin Ther. 1984;6(6):778-86.
A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study of 219 patients with pitting edema of various causes was undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of indapamide, administered orally (PO) in a 2.5-, 5-, or 10-mg once-daily dose, as compared with hydrochlorothiazide, administered PO in a 100-mg once-daily dose. Efficacy was evaluated by determining each patient's weight and degree of pitting edema periodically during 12 weeks of active treatment. Lessening of edema was measured by changes in the depth of pitting in the pretibial area, ten to 14 inches below the patella. The depth of pitting was assigned an arbitrary number between 0 and 4, with 0 equivalent to no edema and 4 equivalent to more than 6 mm of pitting edema. After one week of treatment, the mean reduction of pitting edema from baseline, using the 0 to 4 scale, was 1.6 (30%) in both the indapamide (mean of the three groups) and hydrochlorothiazide groups. There were no significant differences among the three dosage levels of indapamide. After 12 weeks of treatment the mean decrease from baseline was 1.8 (34%), indicating a stable reduction of edema. The mean weight loss at one week was 2.5 kg for the three indapamide groups and 2.6 kg for the hydrochlorothiazide group; this loss was maintained for the 12 weeks of the study. The mean decreases in weight and pitting edema were clinically and statistically significant (P less than 0.05) for both medications.
开展了一项针对219例各种原因所致凹陷性水肿患者的多中心、双盲、平行组研究,以确定吲达帕胺(每日一次口服2.5毫克、5毫克或10毫克)与氢氯噻嗪(每日一次口服100毫克)相比的疗效和安全性。在12周的积极治疗期间,通过定期测定每位患者的体重和凹陷性水肿程度来评估疗效。通过测量髌下10至14英寸处胫前区凹陷深度的变化来衡量水肿减轻情况。凹陷深度被赋予0至4之间的任意数值,0表示无水肿,4表示凹陷性水肿超过6毫米。治疗一周后,吲达帕胺组(三组均值)和氢氯噻嗪组使用0至4评分法,凹陷性水肿较基线的平均减轻程度均为1.6(30%)。吲达帕胺的三个剂量水平之间无显著差异。治疗12周后,较基线的平均下降值为1.8(34%),表明水肿持续减轻。吲达帕胺三个组在一周时的平均体重减轻为2.5千克,氢氯噻嗪组为2.6千克;在研究的12周内体重持续减轻。两种药物的体重和凹陷性水肿平均下降值在临床和统计学上均有显著意义(P小于0.05)。