Spence J D, Huff M, Barnett P A
Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre, London, Canada.
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Spring;7(1):32-7.
To test the claim that indapamide causes fewer adverse metabolic effects than hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), six months of treatment with HCTZ 25 mg/day was compared with six months of treatment with indapamide 2.5 mg in a randomized double-blind study of 44 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Both drugs significantly reduced blood pressure, with no significant differences in the reduction of potassium and chloride; neither drug was associated with a significant change in plasma total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL), apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B or the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL levels. Triglyceride levels increased significantly more with indapamide than with HCTZ (P=0.02). The two drugs had similar effects on blood pressure and serum potassium; neither drug affected plasma glucose. Claims that indapamide is superior to HCTZ appear unwarranted; in view of the substantial cost difference, this finding, if confirmed in larger studies, has important policy implications.
为验证吲达帕胺比氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)引起的不良代谢效应更少这一说法,在一项针对44例轻至中度高血压患者的随机双盲研究中,将每天服用25毫克HCTZ治疗6个月与服用2.5毫克吲达帕胺治疗6个月进行了比较。两种药物均显著降低了血压,在降低钾和氯方面无显著差异;两种药物均未导致血浆总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)、载脂蛋白A1、载脂蛋白B或总胆固醇与HDL水平之比发生显著变化。与HCTZ相比,吲达帕胺使甘油三酯水平显著升高更多(P = 0.02)。两种药物对血压和血清钾的影响相似;两种药物均未影响血糖。认为吲达帕胺优于HCTZ的说法似乎没有依据;鉴于成本存在巨大差异,如果在更大规模的研究中得到证实,这一发现具有重要的政策意义。