Bradley D R, Vido D
Perception. 1984;13(3):315-20. doi: 10.1068/p130315.
Two separate groups of subjects made magnitude estimations of the distances to fifteen objects (from 20 ft to 14.28 miles away) situated in a landscape. On day 1 of the experiment both groups learned the names and locations of the objects while viewing them from the top of a small mountain. On day 2 the perception group (N = 19) judged the distances to the objects while viewing them from the top of the mountain, whereas the memory group (N = 18) judged the distances while visualizing the landscape from memory. The data for both groups were well fit by power functions; the exponent was reliably smaller for the memory group (0.596) than for the perception group (0.811). Both groups drew maps of the landscape (reproduction task) from memory and the exponents were 0.483 and 0.514 for the memory and perception groups, respectively. The results are discussed in light of possible transformations performed on the original stimulus inputs by the sensory/perceptual and the memorial systems.
两组不同的受试者对位于一处景观中的十五个物体(距离从20英尺到14.28英里不等)的距离进行了量级估计。在实验的第一天,两组受试者在从小山顶上观看物体的同时了解了它们的名称和位置。在第二天,感知组(N = 19)在从山顶观看物体时判断它们的距离,而记忆组(N = 18)在凭记忆想象景观时判断距离。两组的数据都能很好地用幂函数拟合;记忆组的指数(0.596)可靠地小于感知组的指数(0.811)。两组都凭记忆绘制了景观地图(再现任务),记忆组和感知组的指数分别为0.483和0.514。根据感觉/感知系统和记忆系统对原始刺激输入可能进行的转换来讨论结果。