Suppr超能文献

危机咨询中的保密性:一种哲学视角

Confidentiality in crisis counseling: a philosophical perspective.

作者信息

Mayo D J

出版信息

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1984 Summer;14(2):96-112. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278x.1984.tb00341.x.

Abstract

Crisis interventionists frequently confront a moral dilemma when violating client trust seems necessary if self-destructive behavior is to be prevented. Two fundamental moral values conflict in such cases: concern for client welfare and respect for client rights and autonomy. Each of these values is grounded in one of two important Western ethical traditions: Utilitarianism and Kantian Formalism, respectively. Following critical examination of each of these theories, attention is given to a series of hypothetical cases involving the confidentiality dilemma.

摘要

危机干预者常常面临一种道德困境

如果要防止自我毁灭行为,违背来访者的信任似乎是必要的。在这种情况下,两种基本的道德价值观相互冲突:对来访者福祉的关切与对来访者权利及自主权的尊重。这些价值观分别基于西方两个重要的伦理传统:功利主义和康德形式主义。在对这些理论逐一进行批判性审视之后,本文将关注一系列涉及保密困境的假设案例。

相似文献

1
Confidentiality in crisis counseling: a philosophical perspective.危机咨询中的保密性:一种哲学视角
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1984 Summer;14(2):96-112. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278x.1984.tb00341.x.
3
Medical confidentiality.医疗保密
J Med Ethics. 1984 Mar;10(1):3-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.1.3.
4
The failure of theories of personhood.人格理论的失败。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999 Dec;9(4):309-24. doi: 10.1353/ken.1999.0023.
6
The moral standing of animals in medical research.动物在医学研究中的道德地位。
Law Med Health Care. 1992 Spring-Summer;20(1-2):7-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01169.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验