Bruckner J
Phys Ther. 1987 Mar;67(3):383-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.3.383.
Ethical dilemmas arise when physical therapists encounter conflicts between loyalty to their patients and loyalty to their employers. This type of ethical conflict is called "the dilemma of the double agent." If physical therapists perceive themselves as agents of their patients, their employment may be threatened. If physical therapists perceive themselves as agents of their employers, their patients may suffer physical or psychological harm. The double-agent dilemma is illustrated in this article by a hypothetical case study derived from sports physical therapy. Three ethical theories--egoism, utilitarianism, and formalism--are used to analyze the conflict and formulate solutions. A second conflict also is raised between patient autonomy and medical paternalism. As physical therapists become more autonomous, they will assume increased responsibility. Inherent in this increased responsibility is the obligation to recognize and confront ethical dilemmas in physical therapy practice. Resolving ethical dilemmas is difficult, but use of ethical theories can help in the systematic examination of basic assumptions and principles. This article introduces therapists to three ethical theories and presents a model for ethical decision making.
当物理治疗师在对患者的忠诚和对雇主的忠诚之间遇到冲突时,就会出现伦理困境。这种伦理冲突被称为“双重代理人困境”。如果物理治疗师将自己视为患者的代理人,他们的工作可能会受到威胁。如果物理治疗师将自己视为雇主的代理人,他们的患者可能会遭受身体或心理伤害。本文通过一个源自运动物理治疗的假设案例研究来说明双重代理人困境。运用三种伦理理论——利己主义、功利主义和形式主义——来分析冲突并制定解决方案。患者自主权和医疗家长主义之间也引发了另一种冲突。随着物理治疗师变得更加自主,他们将承担更多责任。这种增加的责任中内在包含着在物理治疗实践中识别和面对伦理困境的义务。解决伦理困境很困难,但运用伦理理论有助于对基本假设和原则进行系统审视。本文向治疗师介绍三种伦理理论,并提出一个伦理决策模型。