Suppr超能文献

通过干预分析评估社会事件的人口统计学影响:布朗诉托皮卡教育局案判决

Evaluating the demographic impact of societal events through intervention analysis: the Brown vs. Board of Education decision.

作者信息

Hogan T D

出版信息

Demography. 1984 Nov;21(4):673-82.

PMID:6519330
Abstract

Using intervention analysis--a time-series technique gaining increasing use for analyzing the impacts of policy decisions/historic events--this paper reexamines the hypothesis offered by Rindfuss et al., that one consequence of the Brown vs. Board of Education decision in 1954 was a temporary decline in childbearing by white southerners. With data from the 11 former Confederate states, alternative Box-Jenkins/intervention models were estimated to identify/quantify such a decline, but no statistical evidence of a temporary shift in southern white fertility could be found.

摘要

运用干预分析——一种在分析政策决策/历史事件影响方面越来越常用的时间序列技术——本文重新审视了林德富斯等人提出的假设,即1954年布朗诉托皮卡教育局案判决的一个后果是美国南部白人的生育率暂时下降。利用来自11个前邦联州的数据,估计了替代的博克斯-詹金斯/干预模型,以识别/量化这种下降,但未发现美国南部白人生育率出现暂时变化的统计证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验