Cooper S W, Szymczak E G, Jacobus N V, Tally F P
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Dec;20(6):1122-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.6.1122-1125.1984.
Two members of the Bacteroides fragilis group, B. ovatus and B. thetaiotaomicron, are difficult to distinguish by biochemical methods. They are currently identified on the basis of their variable ability to ferment salicin. We studied a method of identification for these two species by using cell lysis by bacteriophages. A total of 38 bacteriophages were used to distinguish the two species. Identification by bacteriophages was compared with species identification by prereduced anaerobically sterilized biochemical testing with salicin as the differentiating test. A total of 215 clinical isolates biochemically identified as B. ovatus or B. thetaiotaomicron were tested. A total of 100% of the strains identified as B. ovatus by bacteriophages produced strong acid in salicin (pH less than or equal to 5.4). However, 40% of the strains identified as B. thetaiotaomicron by bacteriophages also produced strong acid in salicin, and an additional 39% produced weak acid (pH 5.5 to 5.7). This study demonstrates that salicin fermentation is an inadequate test for the differentiation of B. ovatus and B. thetaiotaomicron.
脆弱拟杆菌群的两个成员,卵形拟杆菌和多形拟杆菌,很难通过生化方法区分。目前它们是根据发酵水杨苷的能力差异来鉴定的。我们研究了一种利用噬菌体裂解细胞来鉴定这两个菌种的方法。总共使用了38种噬菌体来区分这两个菌种。将噬菌体鉴定法与以水杨苷为鉴别试验的预还原厌氧灭菌生化试验进行菌种鉴定的方法进行了比较。总共对215株经生化鉴定为卵形拟杆菌或多形拟杆菌的临床分离株进行了检测。通过噬菌体鉴定为卵形拟杆菌的菌株中,100%在水杨苷中产生强酸(pH小于或等于5.4)。然而,通过噬菌体鉴定为多形拟杆菌的菌株中,40%在水杨苷中也产生强酸,另有39%产生弱酸(pH 5.5至5.7)。这项研究表明,水杨苷发酵对于区分卵形拟杆菌和多形拟杆菌来说是一种不充分的试验。