Neuser J
Psychiatr Prax. 1984 Nov;11(6):190-5.
Videorecording of diagnostic interviews is reviewed with respect to its effects upon patient behaviour. If this behaviour is to be a model of the behaviour outside the diagnostic situation, videorecording should not essentially alter behaviour. It can be derived from psychological findings that due to the patient's necessary consent to videorecording, but also by the recording situation itself, patient behaviour is modified. The advantage of audiovision compared to audiorecording to reach a more objective judgement is limited by the very few possibilities of evaluation of nonverbal behaviour. Empirical studies comparing the relative effects of video- and audiorecording have shown that videorecording has more disturbing effects on patients. If these disturbances do have differential effects at certain problems and personality structures of patients using the artifacts of videorecording should be a possibility for the efficient employment of videorecording diagnostic interviews.
针对诊断性访谈的视频记录对患者行为的影响进行了审查。如果这种行为要成为诊断情境之外行为的典范，那么视频记录不应从本质上改变行为。从心理学研究结果可以推断，由于患者对视频记录的必要同意，以及记录情境本身，患者的行为会发生改变。与音频记录相比，视听手段在达成更客观判断方面的优势因非言语行为的评估可能性极少而受到限制。比较视频记录和音频记录相对效果的实证研究表明，视频记录对患者的干扰更大。如果这些干扰在患者的某些问题和人格结构上确实有不同影响，那么利用视频记录的手段应该是有效进行视频记录诊断性访谈的一种可能性。
