Kirk E S, Factor S, Sonnenblick E H
G Ital Cardiol. 1984 Nov;14(11):881-91.
Thus the thrust of these studies suggests that blood flow is the overwhelming factor in determining the consequences of the imbalance of oxygen supply and demand. Moreover, the factors that determine the requirements for tissue survival in the presence of deep ischemia are not the same as those shown for the normal myocardium in figure 1. In deep ischemia, contraction ceases, and metabolism shifts from aerobic to anaerobic pathways. Survival rather than contractile function then becomes the agenda. Not only does supply tend to overshadow demand in determining extent of transmural necrosis, but the anatomical pattern of supply precisely delineates the region at risk following a coronary occlusion as well as the ultimate extent of infarction. These views are summarized in the model presented in figures 12 and 13. The anatomic distribution of the ligated artery determines the lateral limits of the ischemic region (Fig. 12) and thus the lateral extension of necrosis (Fig. 13). The extension of the necrosis across the heart wall depends largely on the status of perfusion within the ischemic region. Extension of an infarct, should it occur, has to be explained by other mechanisms. These might include: (i) vascular obstruction in adjacent vascular systems that were not involved in the first occlusion, (ii) relative ischemia in the normal tissue surrounding the ischemic tissue due to an increased wall stress at the demarcation between contracting and noncontracting tissue, or (9) interruption of vessels supplying large interdigitations of normal tissue within the originally ischemic tissue due to changes associated with the process of infarction of ischemia. Alternatively, much that is called extension of infarction may involve more of the wall transmurally without lateral extension. Additional features of the development of myocardial infarction in figures 12 and 13 include: (i) the development of collateral vessel function resulting in an increased capacity to supply the ischemic area, and (ii) a redistribution of collateral blood flow from necrotic to surviving myocardium within the ischemic area. Thus, as coronary collaterals develop, collateral blood flow becomes increasingly heterogeneous within the ischemic area. Following a coronary occlusion, blood flow is reduced more in the subendocardium, and infarction occurs. Resistance to flow in infarcting tissue increase and causes a redistribution of flow to adjacent surviving layers of myocardium that life toward the epicardium. The process continues and combined with the enlargement of collateral vessels results in a sufficient flow to the epicardial layers so that they may survive.
因此,这些研究的要点表明,血流是决定氧供需失衡后果的压倒性因素。此外,在深度缺血情况下决定组织存活所需的因素与图1中正常心肌所示的因素不同。在深度缺血时,收缩停止,代谢从有氧途径转变为无氧途径。此时,存活而非收缩功能成为首要任务。在决定透壁坏死范围方面,供应不仅往往超过需求,而且供应的解剖模式精确地描绘了冠状动脉闭塞后有风险的区域以及最终梗死范围。这些观点总结在图12和13所示的模型中。结扎动脉的解剖分布决定了缺血区域的侧向界限(图12),从而决定了坏死的侧向延伸(图13)。坏死穿过心脏壁的延伸很大程度上取决于缺血区域内的灌注状态。梗死的延伸(如果发生)必须用其他机制来解释。这些机制可能包括:(i)首次闭塞未涉及的相邻血管系统中的血管阻塞;(ii)由于收缩组织和非收缩组织之间分界处壁应力增加,缺血组织周围正常组织中的相对缺血;或(iii)由于缺血梗死过程相关的变化,供应原始缺血组织内正常组织大交叉指状结构的血管中断。或者,许多所谓的梗死延伸可能涉及更多的心脏壁透壁范围,而没有侧向延伸。图12和13中心肌梗死发展的其他特征包括:(i)侧支血管功能的发展导致供应缺血区域的能力增加;(ii)缺血区域内侧支血流从坏死心肌重新分布到存活心肌。因此,随着冠状动脉侧支的发展,缺血区域内侧支血流变得越来越不均匀。冠状动脉闭塞后,心内膜下血流减少更多,从而发生梗死。梗死组织中的血流阻力增加,并导致血流重新分布到朝向心外膜的相邻存活心肌层。这个过程持续进行,并与侧支血管的扩大相结合,导致流向心外膜层的血流充足,使其得以存活。