• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[1978年至1981年间亚琛检察官办公室受理的针对医生诉讼的初步程序分析]

[Analysis of preliminary procedures in suits against physicians at the Aachen Public Prosecutor's Office between 1978 and 1981].

作者信息

Althoff H, Solbach T

出版信息

Z Rechtsmed. 1984;93(4):273-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00198653.

DOI:10.1007/BF00198653
PMID:6532012
Abstract

Altogether, 318 preliminary proceedings were initiated against physicians, compared to 2 against nonmedical practitioners. The majority i.e., 192 proceedings, dealt with charges of torture and deprivation of freedom committed against patients under psychiatric treatment. Ninety-nine proceedings were based on negligent bodily injury and negligent homicide and 15 on failure to give medical assistance. Other reasons were given in isolated cases only. The proceedings were mostly initiated against surgeons, psychiatrists, general practitioners, internists, gynecologists, and 2 against nonmedical practitioners (42 because of negligent bodily injury and 48 because of negligent homicide). The charges were dropped in accordance with Section 170,2 StPO in 78 cses, Section 153, 153a and 154 StPO in 7 cases, and there were 7 acquittals and 2 sentences after trial. In the remaining preliminary proceedings, the charges were dropped in 215 cases according to Section 170,2 StPO, and in 2 cases according to Section 153a StPO. Three defendants were sentenced to punishment and 1 received a verdict of not guilty. Thus in most of the preliminary proceedings the charges were dropped.

摘要

总计对医生提起了318起初步诉讼程序,相比之下,对非医学从业者提起的诉讼程序为2起。其中大多数,即192起诉讼程序,涉及对接受精神治疗的患者实施酷刑和剥夺自由的指控。99起诉讼程序基于过失身体伤害和过失杀人,15起基于未能提供医疗救助。其他原因仅在个别案例中提及。诉讼程序大多针对外科医生、精神科医生、全科医生、内科医生、妇科医生提起,还有2起针对非医学从业者(42起因过失身体伤害,48起因过失杀人)。根据《刑事诉讼法》第170条第2款,78起案件的指控被撤销;根据《刑事诉讼法》第153条、第153a条和第154条,7起案件的指控被撤销;审判后有7起无罪判决和2起判刑。在其余的初步诉讼程序中,根据《刑事诉讼法》第170条第2款,215起案件的指控被撤销,根据《刑事诉讼法》第153a条,2起案件的指控被撤销。3名被告被判刑,1名被告被宣判无罪。因此,在大多数初步诉讼程序中,指控被撤销。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of preliminary procedures in suits against physicians at the Aachen Public Prosecutor's Office between 1978 and 1981].[1978年至1981年间亚琛检察官办公室受理的针对医生诉讼的初步程序分析]
Z Rechtsmed. 1984;93(4):273-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00198653.
2
[Outcome of preliminary proceedings against medical practitioners suspected of malpractice].对涉嫌医疗事故的执业医师的初步程序结果
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006 Sep 22;131(38):2073-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-951332.
3
[Forensic assessment of suspected medical malpractice and outcome of preliminary proceedings against medical practitioners].[对疑似医疗事故的法医评估及针对执业医生的初步程序结果]
Arch Kriminol. 2014 May-Jun;233(5-6):145-60.
4
[Estimation of medical protocol correctness in the light of opinions issued as ordered by the judiciary or prosecution authorities].[根据司法或检察机关下达指令所发表的意见评估医疗协议的正确性]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Jul;23(133):47-51.
5
Criminal judgments to medical malpractice in Taiwan.台湾地区关于医疗事故的刑事判决
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2009 Apr;11 Suppl 1:S376-8. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
6
Homicide by hanging: A case report and its forensic-medical aspects.缢死:一例报告及其法医学要点
J Forensic Leg Med. 2015 Jul;33:71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
7
[Analysis of final judgements in cases of medical negligence occurred in Ukraine].[乌克兰发生的医疗过失案件终审判决分析]
Wiad Lek. 2018;71(3 pt 2):757-760.
8
Italian law n. 24/2017 on physicians’ criminal liability: a reform that does not solve the problems of the psychiatric practice.意大利关于医生刑事责任的第24/2017号法律:一项未能解决精神科医疗实践问题的改革。
Riv Psichiatr. 2017 Nov-Dec;52(6):213-219. doi: 10.1708/2846.28724.
9
[Legal problems in inquiries and criminal proceedings against physicians - presented from selected cases].[针对医生的调查及刑事诉讼中的法律问题——从部分案例呈现]
Beitr Gerichtl Med. 1980;38:1-8.
10
Criminal liability of physicians and other health care professionals in Hungary (review of case law between 1996-2000).匈牙利医生及其他医疗保健专业人员的刑事责任(1996 - 2000年判例法综述)
Med Law. 2006 Dec;25(4):593-9.

本文引用的文献

1
[Medical malpractice in its penological aspects].[医疗事故的刑法学视角]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1961 Jun 16;86:1187-8.
2
[The law and medicine--from the viewpoint of the medical expert].[法律与医学——从医学专家的视角来看]
Med Welt. 1982 Sep 17;33(37):1278-80.
3
[Historical development of medical malpractice (author's transl)].医疗事故的历史发展(作者译)
Z Rechtsmed. 1981;86(4):303-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00200674.
4
[Recent developments in medical law].[医学法律的最新进展]
Z Rechtsmed. 1984;91(3):165-83. doi: 10.1007/BF02116420.
5
[Medical technical error. From the research and practice of forensic medicine in Tübingen].[医疗技术失误。来自图宾根法医学的研究与实践]
Beitr Gerichtl Med. 1984;42:425-33.
6
[Evaluation of medical treatment errors at the Institute of Forensic Medicine Heidelberg 1978 to 1980].[1978年至1980年海德堡法医学研究所医疗失误评估]
Beitr Gerichtl Med. 1984;42:17-22.
7
[Does the principle "primum nil nocere" establish a particular liability of the physician?].["‘首要的是不伤害’原则是否确立了医生的特定责任?"]
Med Klin. 1971 Jun 11;66(24):899-901.
8
[The physician's technical error].[医生的技术失误]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1975 Sep 5;125(36):499-502.
9
[Results of malpractice expertise].[医疗事故鉴定结果]
Beitr Gerichtl Med. 1978;36:215-21.