Suppr超能文献

吸气上气道阻力的高估。

Overestimation of inspiratory upper airway resistance.

作者信息

Bake B, Ejnell H, Sixt R, Månsson I

出版信息

Clin Physiol. 1984 Feb;4(1):33-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1984.tb00642.x.

Abstract

Inspiratory resistance was found to be 10-50% larger than the expiratory in a model of the upper airways. This was most likely caused by a high kinetic energy component in the airstream close to the constriction reducing the lateral pressure in excess of what could be explained by the frictional pressure drop. Consequently, the inspiratory resistance was overestimated. During expiratory flow, on the other hand, the kinetic energy component at the same site in the trachea was smaller and similar to that in the mouthpiece resulting in an apparently adequate assessment of expiratory resistance. These results may explain why previous authors have found equal inspiratory and expiratory upper airway resistance although the vocal cords abduct during inspiration and adduct during expiration. Pressures obtained by means of the tracheal puncture appeared to be more reliable compared to those obtained from puncture of the cricothyroid membrane.

摘要

在上气道模型中,发现吸气阻力比呼气阻力大10% - 50%。这很可能是由于靠近狭窄处的气流中存在高动能成分,使得侧向压力降低的幅度超过了摩擦压降所能解释的范围。因此,吸气阻力被高估了。另一方面,在呼气过程中,气管同一位置的动能成分较小,与咬嘴处的动能成分相似,从而使得呼气阻力的评估明显足够。这些结果或许可以解释为什么先前的作者发现吸气和呼气时上气道阻力相等,尽管声带在吸气时外展而在呼气时内收。与通过环甲膜穿刺获得的压力相比,通过气管穿刺获得的压力似乎更可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验