Eickhoff J H
Clin Physiol. 1984 Aug;4(4):321-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1984.tb00807.x.
Capillary filtration rate (CFR) was measured by a mercury-in-silastic strain-gauge around the forefoot when the forefoot was lowered 40 cm below heart level. In seven normal limbs, CFR was 0.061 (0.049-0.086) ml (100 g min)-1 against 0.049 (0.016-0.071) ml (100 g min)-1 in 24 limbs with occlusive arterial disease (P = 0.01). About 8 days after arterial reconstruction CFR decreased to 0.039 (0.018-0.071) ml (100 g min)-1, but before 3 months after reconstruction CFR increased to normal values 0.061 (0.037-0.071) ml (100 g min)-1. The explanation offered for the reduced CFR before and immediately after arterial reconstruction is temporary thrombosis in the smallest distributing arteries and in the arterioles resulting in heterogeneous flow distribution and decreased fluid filtration in poorly perfused segments of the capillary bed. The results speak against increased capillary filtration as the aetiology of the post-reconstructive oedema.
当将前足降低至低于心脏水平40厘米时,通过在前足周围放置的硅橡胶应变片式汞柱压力计测量毛细血管滤过率(CFR)。在7条正常肢体中,CFR为0.061(0.049 - 0.086)毫升/(100克·分钟),而在24条患有闭塞性动脉疾病的肢体中,CFR为0.049(0.016 - 0.071)毫升/(100克·分钟)(P = 0.01)。动脉重建后约8天,CFR降至0.039(0.018 - 0.071)毫升/(100克·分钟),但在重建后3个月之前,CFR升至正常水平0.061(0.037 - 0.071)毫升/(100克·分钟)。对于动脉重建前后CFR降低的解释是,最小的分布动脉和小动脉中出现暂时性血栓形成,导致血流分布不均,以及毛细血管床灌注不良节段的液体滤过减少。这些结果反驳了毛细血管滤过增加是重建后水肿病因的观点。