Howze D C, Kotch J B
Child Abuse Negl. 1984;8(4):401-9. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(84)90021-8.
There is a growing body of literature linking stress and child abuse and neglect, but the relationship is not unambiguously supported by empirical data. Two considerations regarding Garbarino's ecological model of child abuse and neglect may explain this research problem. First, any of the predisposing factors, which are grouped into four levels called individual, familial, social, and cultural, may either positively or negatively affect the potential for child abuse and neglect depending upon the quality of social networks and social supports available to families. Second, these factors operate most importantly, not between the perception of stress and the act of abuse or neglect, but through the interpretation of whether a given life event is stressful or not. This clarification of the ecological model points the way to redefining interventions for the primary prevention of child abuse and neglect. Existing support systems can be strengthened in order to increase a family's ability to cope with untoward events before these become stressful. In addition, advocacy activities which support children and families in general can be major components in the primary prevention of child abuse and neglect.
越来越多的文献将压力与虐待和忽视儿童联系起来,但这一关系并未得到实证数据的明确支持。关于加巴里诺的虐待和忽视儿童生态模型的两点考量或许可以解释这一研究问题。其一,任何诱发因素,这些因素被归为四个层次,即个人、家庭、社会和文化层次,可能会对虐待和忽视儿童的可能性产生积极或消极影响,这取决于家庭可获得的社会网络和社会支持的质量。其二,这些因素发挥作用最重要的并非是在压力感知与虐待或忽视行为之间,而是通过对特定生活事件是否具有压力的解读。对生态模型的这一阐释为重新界定虐待和忽视儿童一级预防的干预措施指明了方向。可以加强现有的支持系统,以增强家庭在不良事件变得具有压力之前应对它们的能力。此外,总体上支持儿童和家庭的宣传活动可以成为虐待和忽视儿童一级预防的主要组成部分。