Katz M A, Starr J F
Microcirc Endothelium Lymphatics. 1984 Dec;1(6):727-54.
Although isolated popliteal node perfusion studies have shown intranodal exchange of water between blood and lymph, questions remain about the significance of such studies. Do some nodes exchange protein with blood, and are there shunt pathways around nodes which tend to buffer intranodal exchange of water? Finally, what is the magnitude of difference in using postnodal lymph to compute tissue capillary membrane parameters of reflection coefficient, sigma, and permeability-surface area product, PS? Seventeen conditioned dogs were randomly divided into matched experimental (N = 8) and sham (N = 9) groups in which lumbar trunk lymph was measured for flow (JV) and lymph/plasma protein concentration ratios (R) before and after ligation or sham ligation of the medial iliac lymph node (MILN). Ligation reduced (JV) from 25.89 +/- 4.21 SEM microliter . min-1 . kg-1 to 20.45 +/- 1.84 (P less than .008), decreased R from .66 +/- .04 to .55 +/- .02 (P less than .0000), increased sigma from .42 +/- .04 to .55 +/- .04 (P less than .004), and did not change PS which was 11.45 +/- 2.13 before and 14.43 +/- 4.19 after ligation. No similar changes occurred in the sham group. Of four hypotheses tested, the data were compatible only with post ligation flow equal to the sum of tissue lymph production and efferent flow from upstream nodes. Protein moved from blood into the nodal lymph nearly with the ease of water. Reflection coefficient was 23% higher at the afferent level than in the post nodal lymph, but PS was unaffected by the MILN. Differences in using post nodal sigma and PS to compute tissue fluid levels of protein are about 10% at these flow, and shunt flow is as high as 79% of lumbar trunk flow. Conclusions based upon sigma and PS differences across the node must be tempered because of the possibility of the trend toward lymph-blood equilibration of afferent lymph if it passed through several upstream nodes.
尽管孤立的腘淋巴结灌注研究已经表明血液与淋巴之间在淋巴结内存在水的交换,但此类研究的意义仍存在疑问。是否有一些淋巴结与血液交换蛋白质,以及是否存在绕过淋巴结的分流途径,这些途径倾向于缓冲淋巴结内的水交换?最后,使用淋巴结后的淋巴来计算反射系数σ和通透表面积乘积PS等组织毛细血管膜参数时,差异的程度有多大?17只经过条件训练的狗被随机分为匹配的实验组(N = 8)和假手术组(N = 9),在结扎或假结扎髂内淋巴结(MILN)前后,测量腰干淋巴的流量(JV)以及淋巴/血浆蛋白浓度比(R)。结扎使JV从25.89±4.21 SEM微升·分钟⁻¹·千克⁻¹降至20.45±1.84(P<0.008),使R从0.66±0.04降至0.55±0.02(P<0.0000),使σ从0.42±0.04增至0.55±0.04(P<0.004),并且未改变PS,结扎前PS为11.45±2.13,结扎后为14.43±4.19。假手术组未出现类似变化。在测试的四个假设中,数据仅与结扎后流量等于组织淋巴生成量与上游淋巴结传出流量之和相符。蛋白质从血液进入淋巴结淋巴几乎与水一样容易。传入水平的反射系数比淋巴结后淋巴高23%,但PS不受MILN影响。在这些流量下,使用淋巴结后σ和PS来计算蛋白质组织液水平的差异约为10%,并且分流流量高达腰干流量的79%。由于传入淋巴如果经过几个上游淋巴结可能会趋向于淋巴 - 血液平衡,基于淋巴结两端σ和PS差异得出的结论必须谨慎对待。