Beck-Peccoz P, Romelli P B, Cattaneo M G, Faglia G, White E L, Barlow J W, Stockigt J R
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984 Apr;58(4):736-9. doi: 10.1210/jcem-58-4-736.
Circulating iodothyronine-binding autoantibodies interfere with total T4 and T3 RIAs, giving falsely high or falsely low values depending on the assay separation method used. Direct serum free T4 (FT4) measurement should compensate for such abnormal binding if the method is free of artefact. We assessed 5 different FT4 methods in 12 patients with immunoglobulin binding of iodothyronines, with limited assessment of a sixth method in 2 subjects. Thyroid status was assessed clinically and by measurement of TSH and its response to TRH. T4 methods which use analog tracers, i.e. Amerlex, and Clinical Assays One-step FT4, gave spuriously high values in almost all hypothyroid and some euthyroid patients, due to immunoglobulin binding of the tracers used in these techniques. The kinetic indirect method (Corning Immunophase FT4) gave inappropriately high values in 4 of 6 hypothyroid patients. FT4 by equilibrium dialysis or by adsorption chromatography and RIA, accurately assessed thyroid status. These findings suggest that FT4 methods are valid in patients with circulating iodothyronine-binding immunoglobulins only if the free hormone fraction is physically separated from serum binding proteins before the assay procedure.
循环甲状腺素结合自身抗体会干扰总T4和T3放射免疫分析(RIA),根据所使用的分析分离方法,会给出假性高值或假性低值。如果方法无假象,直接测定血清游离T4(FT4)应能弥补这种异常结合。我们对12例甲状腺素免疫球蛋白结合患者评估了5种不同的FT4测定方法,对另外2例患者有限地评估了第6种方法。通过临床检查以及测定促甲状腺激素(TSH)及其对促甲状腺激素释放激素(TRH)的反应来评估甲状腺状态。使用类似物示踪剂的T4测定方法,即Amerlex和临床分析一步法FT4,在几乎所有甲状腺功能减退患者以及一些甲状腺功能正常患者中给出了假性高值,这是由于这些技术中使用的示踪剂存在免疫球蛋白结合。动力学间接法(康宁免疫相FT4)在6例甲状腺功能减退患者中有4例给出了异常高值。通过平衡透析或吸附色谱法以及RIA测定的FT4能够准确评估甲状腺状态。这些发现表明,只有在分析过程之前将游离激素部分与血清结合蛋白进行物理分离,FT4测定方法才对循环甲状腺素结合免疫球蛋白患者有效。