• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过非调查技术进行麻风病检测。

Leprosy detection through non-survey techniques.

作者信息

Ganapati R, Revankar C R, Bandkar K R, Dongre V V

出版信息

Indian J Lepr. 1984 Jul-Sep;56(3):622-5.

PMID:6549331
Abstract

Most practical and cheap techniques other than mass surveys to detect leprosy in urban slums are still not known. The population inhabiting a large somewhat isolated slum in North Bombay was exposed to intensive health education programmes over a period of two years. Leprosy cases reporting as a result of these measures as well as those detected by trained workers casually or through contact examination were registered at two weekly clinics conducted within the slum. A total of 184 patients out of whom 27 were smear +ve, were identifiable by these means. The population of the slum was found to be 18228. Total prevalence rate of leprosy after examining 14723 subjects in the colony was revealed to be 24 per 1000 (smear +ve cases: 2.2. per 1000) out of which a prevalence of 12.4 per 1000 (smear +ve cases: 1.8 per 1000) had actually come to our knowledge even before instituting mass surveys. The results of this study indicate that in comparable urban situation it should be possible to identify 54% of total leprosy cases by techniques other than surveys. More significantly a striking feature of this study is that 82% of cases of true public health significance namely smear +ve patients could be unearthed by these means.

摘要

除大规模调查外,目前仍不清楚在城市贫民窟中检测麻风病的最实用且廉价的技术。孟买北部一个较大且相对孤立的贫民窟的居民,在两年时间里接受了密集的健康教育项目。因这些措施而报告的麻风病病例,以及由经过培训的工作人员偶然发现或通过接触检查发现的病例,都在贫民窟内每周举办两次的诊所进行登记。通过这些方式共识别出184名患者,其中27名涂片呈阳性。该贫民窟人口为18228人。在对该聚居地14723名受试者进行检查后,麻风病的总患病率为每1000人中有24例(涂片阳性病例:每1000人中有2.2例),其中在开展大规模调查之前,实际已知的患病率为每1000人中有12.4例(涂片阳性病例:每1000人中有1.8例)。这项研究的结果表明,在类似的城市环境中,通过调查以外的技术应该有可能识别出54%的麻风病病例。更重要的是,这项研究的一个显著特点是,通过这些方法可以发现82%具有真正公共卫生意义的病例,即涂片阳性患者。

相似文献

1
Leprosy detection through non-survey techniques.通过非调查技术进行麻风病检测。
Indian J Lepr. 1984 Jul-Sep;56(3):622-5.
2
Comparison of slum survey, school survey and health education as methods of detection of leprosy cases in urban area.
Lepr India. 1982 Oct;54(4):716-20.
3
Prevalence of leprosy in slums in Bombay including a leprosy colony.孟买贫民窟(包括一个麻风病隔离区)的麻风病患病率。
Indian J Lepr. 1985 Apr-Jun;57(2):383-8.
4
An approach to leprosy work in south Bombay--a preliminary communication.
Indian J Lepr. 1984 Apr-Jun;56(2):280-91.
5
Prevalence of leprosy in Agra District (U.P.) India from 2001 to 20031.2001年至2003年印度北方邦阿格拉地区麻风病的患病率1。
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 2005 Jun;73(2):115-21.
6
Detection of previously undetected leprosy cases in a defined rural and urban area of Maharashtra, Western India.在印度西部马哈拉施特拉邦特定的农村和城市地区检测先前未被发现的麻风病例。
Lepr Rev. 2009 Mar;80(1):22-33.
7
Leprosy in China: epidemiological trends between 1949 and 1998.中国的麻风病:1949年至1998年的流行病学趋势
Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(4):306-12. Epub 2003 Jul 2.
8
Awareness and attitudes towards leprosy in urban slums of Kolkata, India.印度加尔各答城市贫民窟对麻风病的认知与态度
Indian J Lepr. 2009 Jul-Sep;81(3):135-40.
9
A comparison of Rapid Village Survey and Leprosy Elimination Campaign, detection methods in two districts of East Java, Indonesia, 1997/1998 and 1999/2000.1997/1998年和1999/2000年印度尼西亚东爪哇两个地区快速村庄调查与麻风病消除运动检测方法的比较
Lepr Rev. 2002 Dec;73(4):366-75.
10
Leprosy situation in the slums of Agra City--epidemiological findings.阿格拉市贫民窟的麻风病情况——流行病学调查结果
Indian J Lepr. 2005 Jul-Sep;77(3):239-45.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomics of a global leprosy eradication programme.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Jun;13(6):677-86. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813060-00004.