Hayashida S, Kitajima K, Joko K
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1983 Apr;29(4):465-76.
The sensitivity of 249 etiological bacterial strains causing inflammation isolated from patients with infections of the urogenital tract who were under treatment on an in-patient basis in our Department was examined by the Disc (3 concentration) assay method. Piperacillin (PIPC) was employed for prophylactic treatment in 18 patients against postoperative infections and for therapeutic treatment in 3 patients against complicated infections of urogenital tracts. The results of these studies are reported along with some discussion on the utility of PIPC in the urological field. The frequency of detection of bacteria isolated from the patients on their admission into our hospital was in the decreasing order of Streptococcus Sp., Proteus Sp. and E. coli Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella Sp. also were noted in some of the patients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, nonfermentative Gram's-negative bacilli (NF- GNB ), and Streptococcus Sp. were detected in many of the patients who had had an operation or who had been in hospital for a long time. The sensitivity of E. coli, Proteus Sp., Streptococcus Sp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was invariably more than 80%, while that of NF- GNB was more than 50%. PIPC was used for prophylactic treatment of patients against infections at the postoperative stage in the urogenital field. Out of 18 cases, it proved to be markedly effective in 14 cases and moderately effective in 4 cases. There was no poorly effective case. PIPC was employed for treatment in 5 cases complicated infections of urogenital tracts. There was no markedly effective case, and 2 moderately effective and 3 poorly effective cases resulted according to the UTI efficacy evaluation standards However, its bacteriological efficacy could be identified in all the treated cases. Therefore, PIPC is a valuable prophylactic antibiotic agent against infections after an operation in the urological field. It may also prove valuable in the therapeutic treatment of complicated infections in the urogenital tracts. PIPC has a relatively large margin of safety in terms of side effects as in the case of conventional penicillin group antibiotics.
采用纸片(3种浓度)法检测了我科住院治疗的泌尿生殖道感染患者分离出的249株引起炎症的病原菌的敏感性。18例患者使用哌拉西林(PIPC)预防术后感染,3例患者使用其治疗泌尿生殖道复杂感染。现将这些研究结果报告,并对PIPC在泌尿外科领域的应用进行一些讨论。患者入院时分离出的细菌检出频率由高到低依次为链球菌属、变形杆菌属和大肠埃希菌。部分患者还检出铜绿假单胞菌和克雷伯菌属。在许多接受过手术或长期住院的患者中检测到铜绿假单胞菌、非发酵革兰阴性杆菌(NF - GNB)和链球菌属。大肠埃希菌、变形杆菌属、链球菌属和铜绿假单胞菌的敏感性始终高于80%,而NF - GNB的敏感性高于50%。PIPC用于泌尿生殖领域患者术后感染的预防治疗。18例中,14例显效,4例中效,无低效病例。5例泌尿生殖道复杂感染患者使用PIPC治疗。根据UTI疗效评估标准,无显效病例,2例中效,3例低效。然而,在所有治疗病例中均可确定其细菌学疗效。因此,PIPC是泌尿外科领域预防术后感染的一种有价值的抗生素。它在泌尿生殖道复杂感染的治疗中也可能有价值。与传统青霉素类抗生素一样,PIPC在副作用方面具有相对较大的安全范围。