Westergaard J G, Lange A P, Pedersen G T, Secher N J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1983;62(2):111-6. doi: 10.3109/00016348309155773.
The efficacy of oral PGE2 tablets and buccal demoxytocin (resoriblets) for the induction of labor in cases of premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) after the 37th week of gestation has been evaluated in a prospective, randomized investigation of 193 women. PGE2 tablets (Prostin) were given to 109 parturients and demoxytocin resoriblets (Sandopart) to 84. The former were given in increasing doses from an initial 0.5 mg to a maximum of 1.5 mg every hour. The demoxytocin was administered at a constant dosage of 50 I.U. every 30 min. The treatment was unsuccessful in 10 of the women treated with PGE2 tablets and in 19 women receiving demoxytocin resoriblets. In addition, the treatment had to be discontinued in 5 women in the PGE2 group due to gastrointestinal side effects. This gives a total success rate of 86.3% for treatment with PGE2 against 77.4% in respect of demoxytocin. This difference is not significant. No difference was observed between the two treatment groups as regards: the stimulation-delivery interval, duration of the various stages of labor, efficacy in primiparae and multiparae, efficacy in patients with a high/low Bishop score. A significantly higher frequency of gastro-intestinal side effects was seen in those treated with PGE2 (21.7%) as compared with demoxytocin (3.6%). The frequency of surgical intervention was 17% in the PGE2 group and 10% in the demoxytocin group. In 4 cases where the stimulation was successful, cesarean section was carried out for reasons unrelated to the drug therapy. Despite the fact that demoxytocin treatment results in fewer side effects than PGE2, the efficacy of the drug is not superior. Based on experience from previous investigations carried out in this department, where intravenous oxytocin was found to be clearly better than oral PGE2 for the induction of labor in cases of PROM, intravenous oxytocin will remain the method of choice due to the shorter period of treatment, which must take priority.
在一项针对193名妇女的前瞻性随机研究中,评估了口服PGE2片剂和颊含去氧催产素(resoriblets)对妊娠37周后胎膜早破(PROM)病例引产的疗效。109名产妇服用PGE2片剂(Prostin),84名产妇服用去氧催产素resoriblets(Sandopart)。前者从初始剂量0.5毫克开始,每小时递增至最大剂量1.5毫克。去氧催产素以每30分钟50国际单位的恒定剂量给药。服用PGE2片剂的10名妇女和接受去氧催产素resoriblets的19名妇女治疗未成功。此外,PGE2组有5名妇女因胃肠道副作用而不得不停止治疗。这使得PGE2治疗的总成功率为86.3%,而去氧催产素为77.4%。这种差异不显著。在以下方面,两个治疗组之间未观察到差异:刺激 - 分娩间隔、产程各阶段的持续时间、初产妇和经产妇的疗效、Bishop评分高/低的患者的疗效。与去氧催产素(3.6%)相比,服用PGE2的患者胃肠道副作用发生率显著更高(21.7%)。PGE2组手术干预频率为17%,去氧催产素组为10%。在4例刺激成功的病例中,剖宫产是由于与药物治疗无关的原因进行的。尽管去氧催产素治疗的副作用比PGE2少,但其疗效并不优越。基于该科室先前进行的研究经验,在PROM病例引产中,静脉注射催产素明显优于口服PGE2,由于治疗时间较短,静脉注射催产素仍将是首选方法,这一点必须优先考虑。