• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚、德意志民主共和国和美利坚合众国的咬合状况认知

Perceptions of occlusal conditions in Australia, the German Democratic Republic and the United States of America.

作者信息

Cons N C, Jenny J, Kohout F J, Freer T J, Eismann D

出版信息

Int Dent J. 1983 Jun;33(2):200-6.

PMID:6575966
Abstract

An instrument developed by Jenny et al. (1980) for rating the public's perceptions of the social acceptability of a wide variety of occlusal configurations was administered to children and adults in Australia, the German Democratic Republic and the United States of America and also to US orthodontists. Mean scores for the 7 groups of subjects from the 3 countries were arranged in rank order from the least socially acceptable to the most socially acceptable and compared. The results indicate that use of the social acceptability scale of occlusal conditions (SASOC) is a highly reliable method for scoring and rank-ordering the aesthetic acceptability of occlusal morphologies. Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients between the ranking of SASOC stimuli by all 7 groups of subjects from the 3 countries ranged from 0.85 to 0.97. The probability of such correlations occurring by chance is less than 1 in 10000 (P less than 0.0001). SASOC proved capable of rank-ordering a wide range of occlusal morphologies for aesthetics with excellent consistency along the entire spectrum from the least acceptable to the most socially acceptable in all 3 countries. The data indicate that norms for socially acceptable dental appearance are essentially the same in Australia, the German Democratic Republic and the United States of America.

摘要

珍妮等人(1980年)开发了一种工具,用于评估公众对各种咬合形态社会可接受性的看法,并将其应用于澳大利亚、德意志民主共和国和美利坚合众国的儿童及成人,以及美国的正畸医生。来自这三个国家的7组受试者的平均得分按照社会可接受程度从低到高进行排序并比较。结果表明,使用咬合状况社会可接受性量表(SASOC)是一种高度可靠的方法,用于对咬合形态的美学可接受性进行评分和排序。来自这三个国家的所有7组受试者对SASOC刺激的排序之间的斯皮尔曼等级相关系数在0.85至0.97之间。这种相关性偶然发生的概率小于万分之一(P<0.0001)。在所有三个国家,SASOC都能够对广泛的咬合形态进行美学排序,并且在从最不可接受到最社会可接受的整个范围内具有出色的一致性。数据表明,在澳大利亚、德意志民主共和国和美利坚合众国,社会可接受的牙齿外观标准基本相同。

相似文献

1
Perceptions of occlusal conditions in Australia, the German Democratic Republic and the United States of America.澳大利亚、德意志民主共和国和美利坚合众国的咬合状况认知
Int Dent J. 1983 Jun;33(2):200-6.
2
Comparing perceptions of dental aesthetics in the USA with those in eleven ethnic groups.比较美国与11个种族群体对牙齿美学的认知。
Int Dent J. 1994 Dec;44(6):489-94.
3
Comparing perceptions of dental aesthetics in the USA with those in eleven ethnic groups.比较美国与11个种族群体对牙齿美学的认知。
Int Dent J. 1994 Oct;44(5):489-94.
4
Perceptions of dental aesthetics in the United States and Nigeria.美国和尼日利亚对牙齿美学的认知。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;26(6):418-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01981.x.
5
Comparison of SASOC, a measure of dental aesthetics, with three orthodontic indices and orthodontist judgment.牙齿美学测量指标SASOC与三种正畸指数及正畸医生判断的比较。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1983 Aug;11(4):236-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1983.tb01884.x.
6
Utility of the dental aesthetic index in industrialized and developing countries.牙齿美学指数在工业化国家和发展中国家的效用。
J Public Health Dent. 1989 Summer;49(3):163-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1989.tb02054.x.
7
Dental Aesthetic Index scores and perception of personal dental appearance among Turkish university students.土耳其大学生的牙科美学指数得分及对个人牙齿外观的认知
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Apr;31(2):168-73. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn083. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
8
Comparing ethnic group-specific DAI equations with the standard DAI.将特定种族的损伤严重程度评分(DAI)方程与标准DAI进行比较。
Int Dent J. 1994 Apr;44(2):153-8.
9
Test of a method to determine socially acceptable occlusal conditions.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1980 Dec;8(8):424-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1980.tb01322.x.
10
[Indices of treatment needs in orthodontics: the applicability of the DAI (Dental Aesthetic Index)].
Minerva Stomatol. 1997 May;46(5):279-86.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral health status and oral health related quality of life in adolescent workers.青少年工人的口腔健康状况及与口腔健康相关的生活质量
Clujul Med. 2018 Oct;91(4):462-468. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-1027. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
2
Impact of malocclusion on the quality of life of children aged 8 to 10 years.错颌畸形对8至10岁儿童生活质量的影响。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Mar-Apr;23(2):46-53. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.2.046-053.oar.
3
Impact of Malocclusion on the Quality of Life of Brazilian Adolescents: A Population-Based Study.错牙合畸形对巴西青少年生活质量的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 30;11(9):e0162715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162715. eCollection 2016.
4
Impact of wearing fixed orthodontic appliances on quality of life among adolescents: Case-control study.佩戴固定正畸矫治器对青少年生活质量的影响:病例对照研究。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Jan;86(1):121-6. doi: 10.2319/100514716.1. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
5
The relationship of dental aesthetic index with dental appearance, smile and desire for orthodontic correction.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 May;2(2):6-12. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1023. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
6
Dental esthetics and its impact on psycho-social well-being and dental self confidence: a campus based survey of north Indian university students.牙齿美学及其对心理社会幸福感和牙齿自信心的影响:一项基于北印度大学生校园的调查
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Dec;13(4):455-60. doi: 10.1007/s13191-012-0247-1. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
7
Factors associated with the desire for orthodontic treatment among Brazilian adolescents and their parents.巴西青少年及其家长对正畸治疗的期望相关因素。
BMC Oral Health. 2009 Dec 18;9:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-9-34.
8
[Analysis of orthopedic jaw treatment requirements].[正畸颌治疗需求分析]
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1986 Aug;47(4):281-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02163451.