Suppr超能文献

使用骨水泥的股骨干病理性骨折固定技术比较

Pathologic femoral shaft fractures comparing fixation techniques using cement.

作者信息

Anderson J T, Erickson J M, Thompson R C, Chao E Y

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978 Mar-Apr(131):273-8.

PMID:657635
Abstract

To determine the most stable mode of internal fixation for the pathologic femoral shaft fracture with extensive cortical destruction, 2 fixation techniques incorporating methylmethacrylate were compared. Osteotomies through standardized cortical defects were created in intact embalmed femora to simulate a standard pathologic fracture. Fixation obtained with either intramedullary Schneider rods or 28-hold ASIF plates, both using bone cement, was compared in torsion and bending. In torsion, plate-fixed femora failed at a mean load of 71.2 newton-meters compared to 26.8 newton-meters for the Schneider rod counterparts. In bending, plate-fixed bones at a mean load of 8133.9 newtons compared to 1921.4 newtons for rod-fixed femora. Fixation with double plates and methylmethacrylate was clearly more stable and allowed for immediate pain-free ambulation.

摘要

为确定广泛皮质破坏的病理性股骨干骨折最稳定的内固定方式,比较了两种结合甲基丙烯酸甲酯的固定技术。通过在完整的防腐股骨上制造标准化皮质缺损进行截骨,以模拟标准病理性骨折。比较了使用骨水泥的髓内施奈德棒或28孔ASIF钢板在扭转和弯曲情况下的固定效果。在扭转试验中,钢板固定的股骨平均在71.2牛顿米的载荷下失效,而施奈德棒固定的股骨为26.8牛顿米。在弯曲试验中,钢板固定的股骨平均在8133.9牛顿的载荷下失效,而棒固定的股骨为1921.4牛顿。双钢板加甲基丙烯酸甲酯固定明显更稳定,可实现立即无痛行走。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验