Lindhe J, Haffajee A D, Socransky S S
J Clin Periodontol. 1983 Jul;10(4):433-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1983.tb01292.x.
Progression of periodontal disease in adult subjects in the absence of periodontal therapy was monitored in 2 populations. One group of 64 Swedish subjects (mean age 40.5 years at entry) with mild to moderate periodontal attachment loss was monitored for attachment level changes at baseline, 3 and 6 years. A second group of 36 Americans (mean age 34.3 years at entry) with advanced destructive periodontal disease was monitored for attachment level changes at baseline and 1 year. Of 4101 sites examined at baseline and at 3 years in the Swedish subjects, only 158 sites (3.9%) showed attachment loss of more than 2 mm. No measurable change was found in 1440 sites (35.1%). Of 4097 sites examined at 3 and 6 years, 67 sites (1.6%) showed attachment loss greater than 2 mm; 57.4% of sites showed no measurable change; and 19 sites (0.5%) showed a decrease in probeable attachment level of more than 2 mm. During the 6-year interval, 523 sites (11.6%) showed attachment loss of more than 2 mm; 20% of sites showed no measurable change and 11 sites (0.2%) showed more than 2 mm of attachment "gain". Approximately 50% of sites that showed no measurable change in the first 3-year period showed loss in the next 3 years. In contrast, of the sites which showed some level of attachment loss in the first period, approximately 2/3 showed no loss in the second monitoring period. Of 3210 sites monitored in the American subjects, 102 sites (3.2%) exhibited more than 2 mm of additional attachment loss; 26% of sites showed no measurable change and 138 sites (4.3%) showed a decrease in probeable attachment level of more than 2 mm. The association between attachment level changes and initial attachment level (baseline) was examined by regression analysis. The slopes of the regression lines for both populations were not consistent with a hypothesis that sites with more advanced attachment loss are more prone to additional destruction, in the absence of treatment, than sites with initially less attachment loss. In the American group, some sites with initially advanced attachment loss, exhibited a decrease in probing attachment level.
在两个群体中监测了未接受牙周治疗的成年受试者牙周疾病的进展情况。一组64名瑞典受试者(入组时平均年龄40.5岁),患有轻度至中度牙周附着丧失,在基线、3年和6年时监测附着水平变化。另一组36名美国受试者(入组时平均年龄34.3岁),患有晚期破坏性牙周疾病,在基线和1年时监测附着水平变化。在瑞典受试者基线和3年时检查的4101个位点中,只有158个位点(3.9%)显示附着丧失超过2mm。1440个位点(35.1%)未发现可测量的变化。在3年和6年时检查的4097个位点中,67个位点(1.6%)显示附着丧失大于2mm;57.4%的位点未显示可测量的变化;19个位点(0.5%)显示可探测的附着水平降低超过2mm。在6年期间,523个位点(11.6%)显示附着丧失超过2mm;20%的位点未显示可测量的变化,11个位点(0.2%)显示附着“增加”超过2mm。在第一个3年期间未显示可测量变化的位点中,约50%在接下来的3年中出现了丧失。相反,在第一个时期显示出一定程度附着丧失的位点中,约2/3在第二个监测期未出现丧失。在美国受试者中监测的3210个位点中,102个位点(3.2%)表现出额外的附着丧失超过2mm;26%的位点未显示可测量的变化,138个位点(4.3%)显示可探测的附着水平降低超过2mm。通过回归分析检查了附着水平变化与初始附着水平(基线)之间的关联。两个群体回归线的斜率均与以下假设不一致:即在未治疗的情况下,附着丧失更严重的位点比初始附着丧失较少的位点更容易发生额外的破坏。在美国组中,一些初始附着丧失严重的位点,其探测附着水平出现了降低。