• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉空间测试练习反应及相关测试泛化中的性别差异。

Sex-related differences in response to practice on a visual-spatial test and generalization to a related test.

作者信息

Connor J M, Schackman M, Serbin L A

出版信息

Child Dev. 1978 Mar;49(1):24-9.

PMID:657893
Abstract

93 first graders (mean age 6.5 years) were given a pretest and posttest on half of the items from the Children's Embedded Figures Test. Half of the children were randomly assigned to a training condition and received a brief training procedure on visual-spatial disembedding prior to the administration of the posttest. Children in the control condition received no training. The performance of girls improved significantly more from pretest to posttest than the performance of boys. Boys and girls showed similar beneficial effects of training in addition to the benefit of direct practice. The tendency that was observed for boys to perform higher than girls on the pretest, p less than .10, was not evident on the posttest. Scores on the pretest predicted scores on a different measure of visual-spatial ability only for children in the control group. The results are interpreted in terms of current theories of sex differences in visual-spatial perception.

摘要

93名一年级学生(平均年龄6.5岁)接受了儿童镶嵌图形测验一半项目的前测和后测。一半的儿童被随机分配到训练组,在进行后测之前接受了关于视觉空间分离的简短训练程序。对照组的儿童没有接受训练。从测试前到测试后,女孩的表现比男孩的表现有更显著的提高。除了直接练习的好处之外,男孩和女孩在训练中都显示出类似的有益效果。在测试前观察到的男孩表现高于女孩的趋势(p小于0.10)在测试后并不明显。仅对于对照组的儿童,前测分数能够预测另一项视觉空间能力测量的分数。研究结果依据当前关于视觉空间感知性别差异的理论进行了解释。

相似文献

1
Sex-related differences in response to practice on a visual-spatial test and generalization to a related test.视觉空间测试练习反应及相关测试泛化中的性别差异。
Child Dev. 1978 Mar;49(1):24-9.
2
Training visual-spatial ability in EMR children.训练电子病历儿童的视觉空间能力。
Am J Ment Defic. 1978 Sep;83(2):116-21.
3
Improving children's mental rotation accuracy with computer game playing.通过玩电脑游戏提高儿童的心理旋转准确性。
J Genet Psychol. 2002 Sep;163(3):272-82. doi: 10.1080/00221320209598683.
4
The importance of gesture in children's spatial reasoning.手势在儿童空间推理中的重要性。
Dev Psychol. 2006 Nov;42(6):1259-68. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1259.
5
Effect of practice and training in spatial skills on embedded figures scores of males and females.空间技能的练习与训练对男性和女性嵌入图形分数的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 1979 Jun;48(3 Pt 1):975-84. doi: 10.2466/pms.1979.48.3.975.
6
Gender differences in spatial ability of young children: the effects of training and processing strategies.儿童空间能力的性别差异:训练和加工策略的影响。
Child Dev. 2010 Sep-Oct;81(5):1417-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01482.x.
7
Difficulty of a spatial task and sex difference in gains from practice.
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Aug;87(1):56-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.56.
8
Sex differences in visual-spatial learning using a virtual water maze in pre-pubertal children.青春期前儿童使用虚拟水迷宫进行视觉空间学习的性别差异。
Behav Brain Res. 2007 Oct 1;183(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.05.011. Epub 2007 May 13.
9
Sex differences and practice effects on two visual-spatial tasks.性别差异及练习对两项视觉空间任务的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 1987 Feb;64(1):139-42. doi: 10.2466/pms.1987.64.1.139.
10
Effect of brief training on sex-related differences in visual-spatial skill.简短训练对视觉空间技能中性别差异的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982 Nov;43(5):1018-29. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.43.5.1018.

引用本文的文献

1
Stereotype susceptibility narrows the gender gap in imagined self-rotation performance.刻板印象易感性缩小了想象中的自我旋转表现的性别差距。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):813-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03194002.
2
Sex differences in visuospatial ability: do performance factors play such an important role?视觉空间能力的性别差异:表现因素是否发挥如此重要的作用?
Mem Cognit. 1996 Jul;24(4):504-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03200938.
3
Spatial ability and throwing accuracy.空间能力与投掷准确性。
Behav Genet. 1983 Jul;13(4):331-40. doi: 10.1007/BF01065771.