Delgado A R, Prieto G
Universidad de Salamanca, Spain.
Mem Cognit. 1996 Jul;24(4):504-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03200938.
This study was designed to analyze some performance factors as a possible source of sex-related bias in psychometric tests of visuospatial aptitude. Goldstein, Haldane, and Mitchell (1990) explored the effect of two response styles-slowness of performance and reluctance to guess-by using a 3-D mental rotation test (the task showing the largest cognitive sex difference) and found that time limits and raw scores contributed substantially to the male advantage. We applied two tests in the speed-power continuum to a representative sample of 621 males and 821 females in their last year of high school in a 2 x 2 (gender x time) full factorial design. Reluctance to guess was similar for males and females. Males obtained more correct responses on both tests, and for both time conditions, than did females. These results are not only statistically significant but also are of substantial practical consequence.
本研究旨在分析一些表现因素,这些因素可能是视觉空间能力心理测量测试中性别相关偏差的一个来源。戈尔茨坦、霍尔丹和米切尔(1990年)通过使用一项三维心理旋转测试(该任务显示出最大的认知性别差异),探讨了两种反应方式——表现缓慢和不愿猜测——的影响,并发现时间限制和原始分数对男性优势有很大贡献。我们在速度-能力连续体上应用了两项测试,采用2×2(性别×时间)完全析因设计,对621名男性和821名女性的高中最后一年代表性样本进行了测试。男性和女性不愿猜测的情况相似。在两种测试中,无论时间条件如何,男性比女性获得的正确答案更多。这些结果不仅具有统计学意义,而且具有重大的实际影响。