Goll G, Smith D E, Plein J B
J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Oct;50(4):466-72. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90564-4.
Circular samples of commonly used liners were prepared and immersed in solutions of nine cleansers. Solutions were changed daily for a period of 1 month. Six properties were tested: color change, porosity, surface distortion, size change, water sorption, and solubility. Statistical analysis was applied to measurements to evaluate performance of both cleansers and liners. The results demonstrate that selection of a liner cannot be based on a single property. Changes in resiliency of the liners were not tested in this experiment, but it is recognized that this could be an important factor in liner selection. The liners found to be least affected by the cleansers were Lynal, Tissuedyne, F.I.T.T., and Hydro-Cast, in that order. Viscogel, Softone, and Veltec were most affected. Clorox/Calgon and Miller demonstrated the same overall average performance, tying for first place for four of the liners. Clorox/Calgon was compatible with most liners (six of eight). Mersene and Duo tied for third and fourth places. The thickness of liner materials made little difference on the effects of the cleansers on the properties evaluated.
制备了常用衬垫的圆形样本，并将其浸泡在九种清洁剂的溶液中。溶液每天更换，持续1个月。测试了六个性能：颜色变化、孔隙率、表面变形、尺寸变化、吸水率和溶解度。对测量结果进行统计分析，以评估清洁剂和衬垫的性能。结果表明，不能仅基于单一性能来选择衬垫。本实验未测试衬垫弹性的变化，但公认这可能是衬垫选择中的一个重要因素。受清洁剂影响最小的衬垫依次是Lynal、Tissuedyne、F.I.T.T.和Hydro-Cast。Viscogel、Softone和Veltec受影响最大。高乐氏/卡尔冈（Clorox/Calgon）和米勒（Miller）表现出相同的总体平均性能，在八种衬垫中的四种上并列第一。高乐氏/卡尔冈与大多数衬垫（八种中的六种）兼容。Mersene和Duo并列第三和第四。衬垫材料的厚度对清洁剂对所评估性能的影响几乎没有差异。
