• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

垄断涂层剂对经清洁和消毒的组织调理剂表面粗糙度的影响:一项接触轮廓测量研究。

Effect of Monopoly-coating Agent on the Surface Roughness of a Tissue Conditioner Subjected to Cleansing and Disinfection: A Contact Profilometric Study.

作者信息

Gupta Pushkar, Ariga Padma, Deogade Suryakant C

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jun;9(Suppl 1):S122-S126. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_112_18.

DOI:10.4103/ccd.ccd_112_18
PMID:29962776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6006873/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Tissue conditioners are used to improve the health of the soft tissues of denture-bearing areas. However, leaching of plasticizers from tissue conditioners results in deterioration, which necessitates frequent replacement. The life of these liners varies, but it can be extended by the use of a coating material.

AIM

To evaluate the surface roughness of a tissue conditioner with monopoly coating, subjected to denture cleanser and disinfectant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty disk-shaped specimens of Visco-gel were made and divided into six groups of 10 each (control 1 [C1], control 2 [C2], control 3 [C3], group 1 [M1], group 2 [M2], and group 3 [M3]). Specimens of the control group were not coated with monopoly, while the specimens of the groups 1, 2, and 3 were coated with monopoly. Specimens of C1 and M1 were immersed in distilled water. Specimens of C2, C3, M2, and M3 were immersed into solution of denture cleanser for 8 h at room temperature and immersed in distilled water for the remainder of the 24-h period. C3 and M3 specimens were treated with disinfectant for 10 min before testing the surface roughness. The surface roughness was measured on 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 day, using a contact profilometer. Student's paired -test was used to compare the mean Ra values within each group. In the present study, < 0.05 was considered as the level of significance.

RESULTS

The mean surface roughness values of M1, M2, and M3 groups were less than C1, C2, and C3, respectively. Among all the groups, M1 showed the least surface roughness values.

CONCLUSION

Monopoly-coating agent prevents the deterioration and reduces the surface roughness of the tissue conditioner.

摘要

引言

组织调理剂用于改善义齿承托区软组织的健康状况。然而,组织调理剂中的增塑剂渗出会导致其性能恶化,这就需要频繁更换。这些衬垫的使用寿命各不相同,但可以通过使用涂层材料来延长。

目的

评估涂有专利涂层的组织调理剂在假牙清洁剂和消毒剂作用下的表面粗糙度。

材料与方法

制作60个圆盘状的Visco - gel样本,并将其分为六组,每组10个(对照组1 [C1]、对照组2 [C2]、对照组3 [C3]、第1组 [M1]、第2组 [M2] 和第3组 [M3])。对照组的样本未涂专利涂层,而第1、2、3组的样本涂有专利涂层。C1和M1组的样本浸泡在蒸馏水中。C2、C3、M2和M3组的样本在室温下浸泡在假牙清洁剂溶液中8小时,在24小时的剩余时间里浸泡在蒸馏水中。C3和M3组的样本在测试表面粗糙度之前用消毒剂处理10分钟。使用接触式轮廓仪在第1、3、5、7和14天测量表面粗糙度。采用学生配对t检验比较每组内的平均Ra值。在本研究中,P < 0.05被视为显著性水平。

结果

M1、M2和M3组的平均表面粗糙度值分别低于C1、C2和C3组。在所有组中,M1组的表面粗糙度值最小。

结论

专利涂层剂可防止组织调理剂性能恶化并降低其表面粗糙度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c80d/6006873/eb8757a442c5/CCD-9-122-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c80d/6006873/eb8757a442c5/CCD-9-122-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c80d/6006873/eb8757a442c5/CCD-9-122-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Monopoly-coating Agent on the Surface Roughness of a Tissue Conditioner Subjected to Cleansing and Disinfection: A Contact Profilometric Study.垄断涂层剂对经清洁和消毒的组织调理剂表面粗糙度的影响:一项接触轮廓测量研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jun;9(Suppl 1):S122-S126. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_112_18.
2
Tissue conditioners protected by a poly(methyl methacrylate) coating.由聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯涂层保护的组织调理剂。
Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Mar-Apr;9(2):137-41.
3
Effect of denture cleanser on weight, surface roughness and tensile bond strength of two resilient denture liners.义齿清洁剂对两种弹性义齿衬垫的重量、表面粗糙度及拉伸粘结强度的影响
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Sep 1;13(5):607-11.
4
Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.组织调理剂与牙科石膏的兼容性:对表面粗糙度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Mar;93(3):274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.011.
5
The effect of disinfectant agents on dimensional stability and surface roughness of a tissue conditioner material.消毒剂对一种组织调理材料尺寸稳定性和表面粗糙度的影响。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(4):499-504. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.90277.
6
Effect of sealer coating and storage methods on the surface roughness of soft liners.封闭剂涂层和储存方法对软衬材料表面粗糙度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Mar;115(3):371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
7
Evaluate the Effect of Commercially Available Denture Cleansers on Surface Hardness and Roughness of Denture Liners at Various Time Intervals.评估市售假牙清洁剂在不同时间间隔对假牙衬垫表面硬度和粗糙度的影响。
Int J Biomed Sci. 2016 Dec;12(4):130-142.
8
Influence of storage methods on the surface roughness of tissue conditioners.储存方法对组织调理剂表面粗糙度的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2008 Mar;27(2):153-8. doi: 10.4012/dmj.27.153.
9
Effect of a denture cleanser on weight, surface roughness, and tensile bond strength of two resilient denture liners.义齿清洁剂对两种弹性义齿衬垫的重量、表面粗糙度及拉伸粘结强度的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 May;89(5):489-94. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00126-4.
10
Effect of beverages, denture cleanser and chlorhexidine gluconate on surface roughness of flexible denture base material: an in vitro study.饮料、义齿清洁剂和葡萄糖酸氯己定对柔性义齿基托材料表面粗糙度的影响:一项体外研究。
Eur Oral Res. 2024 May 5;58(2):76-82. doi: 10.26650/eor.20231177548.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Luteolin Nanoparticles on Bond Strength, Hardness, and Roughness of Tissue Conditioners: An Study.木犀草素纳米颗粒对组织调理剂粘结强度、硬度和粗糙度的影响:一项研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2025 Apr 30;15(2):184-191. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_6_25. eCollection 2025 Mar-Apr.
2
Antifungal Efficacy of Essential Oil in Tissue Conditioner Against : An Study.组织调理剂中精油的抗真菌功效:一项研究。 (你提供的原文似乎不完整,against后面应该还有具体对象等内容)
Contemp Clin Dent. 2023 Apr-Jun;14(2):115-122. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_654_21. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
3
Knowledge and awareness of dental students on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of sealer coating and storage methods on the surface roughness of soft liners.封闭剂涂层和储存方法对软衬材料表面粗糙度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Mar;115(3):371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
2
Compatibility of tissue conditioners and denture cleansers: influence on surface conditions.义齿清洁剂和义齿稳固剂的兼容性:对表面状况的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2010 Aug;29(4):446-53. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2009-135. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
3
Effect of enzymatic and NaOCl treatments on acrylic roughness and on biofilm accumulation.
牙科学生对注意力缺陷多动障碍的认知与了解。
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Nov;13(Suppl 1):S308-S313. doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_427_22. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
酶处理和次氯酸钠处理对丙烯酸树脂粗糙度及生物膜积聚的影响。
J Oral Rehabil. 2006 May;33(5):356-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01564.x.
4
Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.组织调理剂与牙科石膏的兼容性:对表面粗糙度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Mar;93(3):274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.011.
5
Leaching of plasticizers from temporary denture soft lining materials.增塑剂从临时义齿软衬材料中的浸出。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Feb;112(1):101-4. doi: 10.1111/j.0909-8836.2004.00091.x.
6
The effect of disinfectant solutions on the hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth.消毒剂溶液对丙烯酸树脂假牙牙齿硬度的影响。
J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Jul;30(7):749-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01145.x.
7
A clinical and microbiological evaluation of denture cleansers for geriatric patients in long-term care institutions.长期护理机构中老年患者假牙清洁剂的临床与微生物学评估
J Can Dent Assoc. 2002 Jan;68(1):39-45.
8
[Investigation of water sorption and solubility of three denture soft lining materials].
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2001 Sep;18(3):342-5.
9
Roughness of denture materials: a comparative study.义齿材料的粗糙度:一项对比研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2000 Mar-Apr;13(2):136-40.
10
Setting and stress relaxation behavior of resilient denture liners.
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Dec;80(6):714-22. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70060-5.