[Mechanical strain in the forearm bones].

Knowledge of the physiologic distribution of strain in bone is essential for a successful osteosynthesis by means of compression plate. This method guarantees optimum stability if the plate acts as a tension band. If the side of tensile stresses varies within the bone, strain may not only occur on the side of the plate but also on the opposite cortex. In such cases the distribution of pressure in the fracture gap is of special importance. For determining the distribution of strain on the radius, it is necessary to examine the forces caused by the flexor- and extensor muscles of the wrist and fingers. Additional forces come also from flexor- and extensor muscles of the elbow. The frame formed by the bow-shaped radius and the ulna is of further importance for the distribution of strain. Kind and amount of tension is fundamentally influenced by forearm rotation. Anatomic studies on post-mortem specimens showed how the direction of muscle action to wrist and fingers changed in relation to the position of a plate fixed to the proximal shaft of the radius. This already demonstrates possible variations in the bending forces caused by forearm rotation. An analysis of the distribution of strain in the forearm bones was carried out on a biomechanical model using strain gauges. This method allows the simulation of strain to the skeleton caused by muscle force and the influence of load. The distribution of strain can be studied on the same model in various different positions of elbow and forearm. Six muscles and two muscle groups were simulated by means of wire pulls with calibrated strain gauges; these muscles and muscle groups act, on account of the physiological cross section and their position, as bending forces to the forearm bones in a dorsovolar plane. The tensile force on radius and ulna were each controlled by three strain gauges in four sections. The characteristic quantities of these sections were determined by evaluation of the appropriate computertomograms. With the aid of three strain gauges per section it was possible to assess the strain at any one desired point. Distribution of strain was determined by pull to each "muscle" in the extreme position of forearm rotation and three different positions of flexion to the elbow. The tensile force was expressed on graphs as muscle tension of 2 kp/cm2 per cross section (ill. 6 to 12).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)