Hurlburt C E, Coggins L J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984 Apr;57(4):451-4. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90168-3.
Six panoramic radiographs, each made with a different screen/film combination, were compared for "periapical visibility" by fourteen dentists. Two combinations (a par-speed and a high-speed) used calcium tungstate screens, and three used rare earth screen systems four times faster than par-speed. One other combination consisted of a single rare earth screen plus a single-coated detail film. The radiographs produced by the faster rare earth screen/film combinations were found to be similar in quality to those produced by calcium tungstate screens. Rare earth screens could be used for panoramic radiography while maintaining quality and reducing exposure.
十四位牙医对六张全景X光片进行了比较,每张片子采用不同的增感屏/胶片组合,以评估“根尖周可见度”。两种组合(一种准速和一种高速)使用钨酸钙增感屏,三种使用比准速快四倍的稀土增感屏系统。另一种组合由一块单一稀土增感屏加一张单面涂布的细节胶片组成。结果发现,由速度更快的稀土增感屏/胶片组合产生的X光片在质量上与钨酸钙增感屏产生的片子相似。稀土增感屏可用于全景X光摄影,同时保持质量并减少曝光量。