Willén J, Dahllöf A G, Nordwall A
Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1983;9:195-205.
Thirty-seven patients with unstable thoracolumbar fractures and paraplegia were studied: 11 patients were given exclusively conservative treatment, 14 patients were treated conservatively after laminectomy with or without fusion, and 12 patients were treated with Harrington instrumentation. None of the 12 cases with complete paraparesis at admission to the hospital improved their neurological status. In patients with moderate and severe but not complete paraparesis one month after injury, the neurological improvement continued for several years and in many the neurological restitution was complete. There was no difference between the three treatment groups regarding the neurological improvement. A new Rehabilitation Index was constructed with special reference to paraplegic patients. One month after the injury the Rehabilitation Score in the Harrington group was considerably higher than in the other groups. After three months the score was equalized in the conservatively treated group and the Harrington group whereas the score of the laminectomy-fusion group remained lower as long as two years after injury. Thirty-two patients were followed-up two years after the injury. Irrespective of the treatment, 30 of 32 patients had reached their maximal ADL scores at the follow-up. In 19 patients the bladder function was satisfactory. Eleven patients could walk independently. Twelve patients used wheel-chairs. Twenty-eight patients managed outdoor transportation without help. Twenty-four patients (75 per cent) had returned to work. Complaints about back deformity, skin problems and pain at direct pressure over the fracture site were significantly more frequent in the conservative and laminectomy-fusion groups. The treatment with open reduction, fusion and stabilization with Harrington rods considerably reduced the immobilization and hospitalization time. The complications were few. - The Harrington operation resulted in an early rehabilitation, which is of great psychological importance for the patient. - Our study confirms the disadvantages of laminectomy followed by conservative treatment reported by other authors.
对37例伴有截瘫的不稳定胸腰椎骨折患者进行了研究:11例仅接受保守治疗,14例在椎板切除术后接受保守治疗(有或无融合术),12例接受哈灵顿器械治疗。入院时完全性截瘫的12例患者中,无一例神经功能状态得到改善。损伤后1个月时中度和重度但非完全性截瘫的患者,神经功能改善持续数年,许多患者神经功能完全恢复。三个治疗组在神经功能改善方面无差异。构建了一个特别针对截瘫患者的新康复指数。损伤后1个月,哈灵顿组的康复评分明显高于其他组。3个月后,保守治疗组和哈灵顿组的评分持平,而椎板切除融合组的评分在损伤后长达两年仍较低。32例患者在损伤后两年进行了随访。无论接受何种治疗,32例患者中有30例在随访时达到了最大日常生活活动评分。19例患者膀胱功能良好。11例患者能够独立行走。12例患者使用轮椅。28例患者无需帮助即可进行户外出行。24例患者(75%)已重返工作岗位。保守治疗组和椎板切除融合组中,关于背部畸形、皮肤问题以及骨折部位直接受压疼痛的主诉明显更频繁。采用哈灵顿棒进行切开复位、融合和固定的治疗显著缩短了固定时间和住院时间。并发症较少。——哈灵顿手术带来了早期康复,这对患者具有重要的心理意义。——我们的研究证实了其他作者报道的椎板切除术后保守治疗的缺点。