Suppr超能文献

近端龋损的检测:双片与四片咬合翼片X线摄影术

Detection of proximal carious lesions: two-film versus four-film bitewing radiography.

作者信息

Kaffe I, Gordon M, Laufer B, Littner M M

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984 May;57(5):567-71. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90319-0.

Abstract

The use of four posterior bitewing radiographs was compared with the use of two bitewing radiographs in fifty patients. The radiographs were evaluated with regard to the number of proximal carious lesions that could be detected and the number of technical errors in each technique. It was concluded that the four-bitewing radiographic technique is easier to perform, produces fewer technical errors, and provides the clinician with more diagnostic information than the two-bitewing radiographic method, and it is therefore recommended for routine radiographic examination.

摘要

在50名患者中,对使用四张后牙合翼片与使用两张牙合翼片进行了比较。根据可检测到的邻面龋损数量以及每种技术中的技术错误数量对这些X光片进行了评估。得出的结论是,与两张牙合翼片的放射照相方法相比,四张牙合翼片的放射照相技术更容易操作,产生的技术错误更少,并且为临床医生提供了更多的诊断信息,因此推荐用于常规放射检查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验