Kaffe I, Gordon M, Laufer B, Littner M M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984 May;57(5):567-71. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90319-0.
The use of four posterior bitewing radiographs was compared with the use of two bitewing radiographs in fifty patients. The radiographs were evaluated with regard to the number of proximal carious lesions that could be detected and the number of technical errors in each technique. It was concluded that the four-bitewing radiographic technique is easier to perform, produces fewer technical errors, and provides the clinician with more diagnostic information than the two-bitewing radiographic method, and it is therefore recommended for routine radiographic examination.
在50名患者中,对使用四张后牙合翼片与使用两张牙合翼片进行了比较。根据可检测到的邻面龋损数量以及每种技术中的技术错误数量对这些X光片进行了评估。得出的结论是,与两张牙合翼片的放射照相方法相比,四张牙合翼片的放射照相技术更容易操作,产生的技术错误更少,并且为临床医生提供了更多的诊断信息,因此推荐用于常规放射检查。