Sadowsky D, Kunzel C
J Am Dent Assoc. 1984 Sep;109(3):425-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0402.
Analysis of our data indicates confusion about, and lack of compliance with, the AHA recommendations. Clinician level of knowledge varies with issues of risk management and by specialty group membership. Patient groups that are particularly problematic include children and all patients with congenital heart disease, those receiving a continuing antibiotic regimen for secondary prevention of rheumatic fever, those with a penicillin allergy, and those with prosthetic heart valves. Another area of clinician uncertainty concerns dental procedures which may or may not be associated with the possible causation of bacterial endocarditis. The biodynamic principles involved in endocarditis are central to the structure of the AHA recommendations. These principles, as well as those which provide theoretical support for the loading dose, timing, sequence, and duration recommended by the AHA, have been presented with the hope that clinician compliance with these recommendations will be increased.
对我们数据的分析表明,临床医生对美国心脏协会(AHA)的建议存在困惑且未遵循这些建议。临床医生的知识水平因风险管理问题和专业组成员身份而异。特别成问题的患者群体包括儿童以及所有先天性心脏病患者、接受持续抗生素治疗以预防风湿热复发的患者、对青霉素过敏的患者以及有人工心脏瓣膜的患者。临床医生不确定的另一个领域涉及牙科手术,这些手术可能与细菌性心内膜炎的可能病因有关,也可能无关。心内膜炎所涉及的生物动力学原理是AHA建议结构的核心。介绍这些原理以及那些为AHA推荐的负荷剂量、时机、顺序和持续时间提供理论支持的原理,希望能提高临床医生对这些建议的遵循程度。