Lutz W K
Arch Toxicol Suppl. 1984;7:194-207. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-69132-4_29.
Many mutagens and carcinogens act via covalent interaction of metabolic intermediates with DNA in the target cell. This report groups those structural elements which are often found to form the basis for a metabolism to such chemically reactive metabolites. Compounds which are chemically reactive per se and which do not require metabolic activation form group 1. Group 2 comprises of olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons where the oxidation via an epoxide can be responsible for the generation of reactive species. Aromatic amines, hydrazines, and nitrosamines form group 3 requiring an oxidation of a nitrogen atom or of a carbon atom in alpha position to a nitrosated amine. Group 4 compounds are halogenated hydrocarbons which can either give rise to radicals or can form an olefin (group 2) upon dehydrohalogenation. Group 5 compounds depend upon some preceding enzymatic activity either not available in the target cell or acting on positions in the molecule which are not directly involved in the subsequent formation of electrophilic atoms. Examples for each group are taken from the "List of Chemicals and Industrial Processes Associated with Cancer in Humans" as compiled by the International Agency for the Research on Cancer, and it is shown that 91% of the organic carcinogens would have been detected on the basis of structural elements characteristic for group 1-5. As opposed to this very high sensitivity, the specificity (the true negative fraction) of using this approach as a short-term test for carcinogenicity is shown to be bad because detoxification pathways have so far not been taken into account. These competing processes are so complex, however, that either only very extensive knowledge about pharmacokinetics, stability, and reactivity will be required or that in vivo systems have to be used to predict, on a quantitative basis, the damage expected on the DNA. DNA-binding experiments in vivo are presented with benzene and toluene to demonstrate one possible way for an experimental assessment and it is shown that the detoxification reaction at the methyl group available only in toluene gives rise to a reduction by at least a factor of forty for the binding to rat liver DNA. This quantitative approach available with DNA-binding tests in vivo, also allows evaluation as to whether reactive metabolites and their DNA binding are always the most important single activities contributing to the overall carcinogenicity of a chemical.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
许多诱变剂和致癌物通过代谢中间体与靶细胞中的DNA发生共价相互作用来发挥作用。本报告将那些经常被发现构成此类化学反应性代谢物代谢基础的结构元素进行了分类。本身具有化学反应性且不需要代谢活化的化合物归为第1组。第2组包括烯烃和芳烃,通过环氧化物氧化可产生反应性物种。芳香胺、肼和亚硝胺形成第3组,需要将氮原子或α位碳原子氧化为亚硝化胺。第4组化合物是卤代烃,它们可以产生自由基,或者在脱卤化氢后形成烯烃(第2组)。第5组化合物依赖于靶细胞中不存在的某些先前酶活性,或者作用于分子中不直接参与随后亲电原子形成的位置。每组的例子均取自国际癌症研究机构编制的《与人类癌症相关的化学品和工业过程清单》,结果表明,91%的有机致癌物可根据第1 - 5组的特征结构元素检测出来。与这种非常高的灵敏度相反,将这种方法用作致癌性短期测试的特异性(真阴性率)很差,因为目前尚未考虑解毒途径。然而,这些竞争过程非常复杂,要么需要非常广泛的药代动力学、稳定性和反应性知识,要么必须使用体内系统来定量预测对DNA预期的损伤。文中展示了苯和甲苯在体内的DNA结合实验,以说明一种可能的实验评估方法,结果表明,仅甲苯中存在的甲基解毒反应使与大鼠肝脏DNA的结合减少了至少40倍。这种体内DNA结合测试可用的定量方法,还可以评估反应性代谢物及其与DNA的结合是否始终是导致化学品整体致癌性的最重要单一活性。(摘要截选至400字)