Ainamo J, Nordblad A, Kallio P
Int Dent J. 1984 Dec;34(4):285-91.
The aim of this study was to find the optimal approach to the use of the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN) in age groups under 20 years of age in which the presence of false pockets around erupting teeth has caused confusion. Fifty boys and fifty girls in each age group of 7-, 12- and 17 years were selected at random from among young patients attending for regular dental care. To allow detailed analysis, CPITN recordings were made for each tooth instead of per sextant. The 4-5 mm pockets were divided into true pathologic pockets requiring scaling and improved oral hygiene; false pockets with bleeding after gentle probing and thus needing improved oral hygiene only; and false pockets with no treatment need. Comparisons of periodontal treatment needs per sextant were made after basing the CPITN code number on examination of all teeth in the sextant, of the CPITN epidemiological index teeth (17, 16; 11; 26, 27; 37, 36; 31; 46, 47), and of teeth 16, 11, 26, 36, 31, 46. Incomplete eruption even of first molars and maxillary central incisors was frequently observed at age 7 whereas at ages 12 and 17 the presence of false pockets was most frequent around mandibular and maxillary second molars. It is suggested that in populations under 20 years of age CPITN recordings should be based on examination of teeth 16, 11, 26, 36, 31, 46.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究的目的是找到在20岁以下年龄组中使用社区牙周治疗需求指数(CPITN)的最佳方法,在这些年龄组中,正在萌出牙齿周围出现的假性牙周袋造成了混淆。从接受定期牙科护理的年轻患者中随机挑选出7岁、12岁和17岁各年龄组的50名男孩和50名女孩。为了进行详细分析,CPITN记录是针对每颗牙齿而非每个牙 sextant 进行的。将4 - 5毫米的牙周袋分为需要刮治和改善口腔卫生的真性病理牙周袋;轻探诊后出血的假性牙周袋,因此仅需改善口腔卫生;以及无需治疗的假性牙周袋。在根据CPITN编码数字对 sextant 中的所有牙齿进行检查、对CPITN流行病学指数牙(17、16;11;26、27;37、36;31;46、47)以及对牙齿16、11、26、36、31、46进行检查之后,对每个 sextant 的牙周治疗需求进行了比较。在7岁时经常观察到第一磨牙甚至上颌中切牙萌出不完全,而在12岁和17岁时,下颌和上颌第二磨牙周围出现假性牙周袋的情况最为常见。建议在20岁以下人群中,CPITN记录应基于对牙齿16、11、26、36、31、46的检查。(摘要截短为250字)