• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Intervention in large bowel carcinogenesis--does screening improve prognosis?

作者信息

Farrands P A, Britton D C

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1984;104:151-9.

PMID:6597547
Abstract

Cancer of the large bowel is the second most common malignant tumour in the western world, with approximately 20,000 new cases registered each year in England and Wales. No improvement in the survival figures has occurred in the past 30 years, and since 1970 the number of deaths per annum in Great Britain has been rising. The prognosis of the disease is related directly to the degree of centrifugal spread of the tumour. Patients with cancer limited to the bowel wall have a corrected 5-year survival of about 90%, whereas those with tumours with lymphatic spread have a 5-year survival of about 30%. The prognosis for early colorectal tumours is therefore good, but a method of identifying such lesions is required. If early tumours bleed, the detection of occult blood in the faeces may be a valuable screening test for colorectal cancer. In one town, 8,925 asymptomatic people over the age of 40 were invited to be screened for faecal occult bleeding using Haemoccult slides. The invitation was accepted by 2,439 patients, a compliance rate of 27%. On Haemoccult screening 121 patients were positive initially, but 39 of these were found to be false-positive after further investigation. Haemoccult therefore gives a false-positive incidence of 30%. Twelve tumours of the bowel were identified, eight polyps and four cancers. Another patient who had been negative in the screening survey was identified within 2 months of the end of the experiment as having large-bowel cancer. This means that Haemoccult gives a false negative rate, in our hands, of 20%. The ability of a cancer screening procedure to identify and cure early tumours depends upon the compliance of the population, the sensitivity of the test and the availability of effective treatment. The poor compliance of our population and the disappointing sensitivity of Haemoccult mean that occult blood screening for early large bowel cancer remains theoretically possible but practically inefficient.

摘要

相似文献

1
Intervention in large bowel carcinogenesis--does screening improve prognosis?
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1984;104:151-9.
2
Patient compliance with colorectal cancer screening in general practice.全科医疗中患者对结直肠癌筛查的依从性。
Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Jan;42(354):18-20.
3
Colorectal cancer screening: new opportunities.结直肠癌筛查:新机遇。
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1999 Oct;8(4):673-91, vi-vii.
4
Screening for colorectal carcinoma: an analysis of the sensitivity of haemoccult.结直肠癌筛查:潜血检测敏感性分析
Br J Surg. 1992 Aug;79(8):833-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790842.
5
Screening for gastrointestinal neoplasia: efficacy and cost of two different approaches in a clinical rehabilitation centre.胃肠道肿瘤筛查:临床康复中心两种不同方法的疗效与成本
Eur J Cancer Prev. 1996 Feb;5(1):49-55.
6
Screening for colorectal cancer in a Hungarian county.匈牙利某县的结直肠癌筛查
Endoscopy. 1985 May;17(3):109-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018473.
7
[Early diagnosis of colorectal cancer: technical problems and acceptability].
Soz Praventivmed. 1986;31(2):83-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02091590.
8
Planning for a possible national colorectal cancer screening programme.规划一项可能的全国性结直肠癌筛查计划。
J Med Screen. 1998;5(4):187-94. doi: 10.1136/jms.5.4.187.
9
An adapted program of colorectal cancer screening--7 years experience and cost-benefit analysis.一项适应性结直肠癌筛查计划——7年经验与成本效益分析
Hepatogastroenterology. 1994 Oct;41(5):413-6.
10
Self-reported dark red bleeding as a marker comparable with occult blood testing in screening for large bowel neoplasms.
Br J Surg. 1983 Dec;70(12):721-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800701209.