Lindholm H
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1983;304:1-127.
The aim of the study was to find relevant methods and use them to investigate the effects of sectorized psychiatry on former mental hospital patients. Seventeen hypotheses were formulated, concerning both positive and negative effects of sectorized psychiatry. Relevance and expected availability decided the variables, which were based on information from medical registers, case records, death certificates, social authorities, courts of law, public health insurance, census office and personal interviews. The hypotheses were tested by the use of two groups of patients, 377 in one experimental group, and 377 in one control group. A matched control method was used. The study patients were domiciled in the catchment area for the first complete trial of sectorized psychiatric service in the Stockholm area. The control patients were domiciled in the catchment area for the remaining divisions of Beckomberga Mental Hospital. During the actual years, an experimental situation was at hand. Comparisons in each pair were performed, regarding the experimental year 1980. A methodological description of variables for measurement of the effects and changes in psychiatric care is presented. The comparison showed no significant differences in the analyses, regarding utilization of inpatient care at Beckomberga Hospital in 1980. Study patients had significantly more outpatient visits and day-care days compared to controls. Study patients reported significantly shorter time of public transportation between home and psychiatric service. Study patients were significantly more often discharged to the division's own agencies compared to controls. Study patients reported significantly less satisfaction with ward staff than controls. No significant differences in direct cost of treatment during the experimental year were registered. The conclusion is, that there are no consistent tendencies proving the new organization superior to the traditional one for these former mental hospital patients.
该研究的目的是找到相关方法,并运用这些方法调查分区精神病治疗对 former mental hospital 患者的影响。提出了17个假设,涉及分区精神病治疗的积极和消极影响。相关性和预期可得性决定了变量,这些变量基于来自医疗登记册、病例记录、死亡证明、社会当局、法院、公共医疗保险、人口普查办公室和个人访谈的信息。通过两组患者进行假设检验,一组实验组有377名患者,一组对照组有377名患者。采用了匹配对照法。研究患者居住在斯德哥尔摩地区首次全面试行分区精神病服务的集水区。对照患者居住在贝克姆贝加精神病院其余分院的集水区。在实际年份里,存在一种实验情况。针对1980年实验年份进行了每对之间的比较。给出了精神病护理效果和变化测量变量的方法描述。比较显示,在分析中,关于1980年贝克姆贝加医院住院护理的使用情况,没有显著差异。与对照组相比,研究患者的门诊就诊次数和日间护理天数显著更多。研究患者报告称,从家到精神病服务机构的公共交通时间显著更短。与对照组相比,研究患者被显著更频繁地转至该部门自己的机构。与对照组相比,研究患者对病房工作人员的满意度显著更低。实验年份的治疗直接成本没有显著差异。结论是,对于这些 former mental hospital 患者,没有一致的趋势证明新组织优于传统组织。