Suppr超能文献

同性恋取向的假设与认知同公民自由权利缩减之间的关系。

The relationship of assumption and knowledge of the homosexual orientation to the abridgment of civil liberties.

作者信息

Liljestrand P, Petersen R P, Zellers R

出版信息

J Homosex. 1978 Spring;3(3):243-8. doi: 10.1300/J082v03n03_06.

Abstract

This article is concerned with the relationship of assumption or knowledge of departure from the heterosexual orientation to the abridgment of civil liberties. The methodology for obtaining data on sexual orientation is described. The definitions for assumption and knowledge of sexual orientation is described. The definitions for assumption and knowledge of sexual orientation are provided. The results indicated that: (a) the most frequently violated civil liberties were equality and procedural due process; (b) there was more assumption than knowledge of sexual orientation; (c) patterns of violations of civil liberties were similar whether sexual orientation was known or assumed; and (d) there was much more use of avoidance than any other mode of resolution, both when the sexual orientation was known and when it was assumed.

摘要

本文关注对偏离异性恋取向的假设或认知与公民自由权缩减之间的关系。文中描述了获取性取向数据的方法。给出了性取向假设和认知的定义。结果表明:(a)最常被侵犯的公民自由权是平等权和程序性正当程序;(b)关于性取向,假设的情况比认知的情况更多;(c)无论性取向是已知还是假设的,侵犯公民自由权的模式都是相似的;(d)无论是已知性取向还是假设性取向,相比于其他任何解决方式,回避的使用都要多得多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验