Suppr超能文献

东南癌症研究组:1972 - 1982年乳腺癌研究

Southeastern Cancer Study Group: breast cancer studies 1972-1982.

作者信息

Smalley R V, Bartolucci A A, Moore M, Vogel C, Carpenter J, Perez C A, Velez-Garcia E, Marcial V, Lefante J, Wittliff J

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1983 Dec;9(12):1867-74. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(83)90354-1.

Abstract

During the past 10 years, the Southeastern Cancer Study Group (SECSG) has been engaged in one major adjuvant study and three major advanced disease studies for patients with adenocarcinoma of the breast. The adjuvant study is demonstrating that six months of adjuvant CMF is the therapeutic equivalent of 12 months and that post-operative irradiation is of no added therapeutic benefit. In patients with advanced disease, a low dose 5 drug combination of CMFVP induces more objective responses than single agent 5FU, but improves survival only for those patients with liver metastases when compared to the sequential use of the same 5 single agents. The three drug combination, CAF, utilizing doxorubicin, induces more objective responses than low dose CMFVP, but it does not improve overall survival. The subsets of patients with bone-only metastases, with local chest wall recurrence and with nodular lung metastases benefit from CAF in terms of a longer duration of disease control and longer duration of unmaintained remission, but have only a marginal improvement in survival. The addition of a phase active combination, CAMELEON, (i.e., sequentially alternating therapy) to CAF has not improved the duration of disease control and survival for patients with liver metastases, lymphangitic and nodular lung metastases compared to CAF. Aggressive combination chemotherapeutic approaches to patients with advanced disease provide better and longer disease and tumor control but only marginal improvements in overall survival. Adding additional agents to a maximally tolerable regimen has not improved the therapeutic outcome.

摘要

在过去10年中,东南癌症研究组(SECSG)针对乳腺癌患者开展了一项主要的辅助研究和三项主要的晚期疾病研究。辅助研究表明,6个月的辅助性CMF方案与12个月的方案治疗效果相当,且术后放疗并无额外的治疗益处。对于晚期疾病患者,低剂量的CMFVP五药联合方案比单药5-氟尿嘧啶能诱导更多的客观缓解,但与序贯使用相同的5种单药相比,仅对有肝转移的患者能提高生存率。使用阿霉素的三药联合方案CAF比低剂量CMFVP能诱导更多的客观缓解,但并未提高总生存率。仅发生骨转移、局部胸壁复发和结节性肺转移的患者亚组,从CAF方案中获益,表现为疾病控制时间延长和未维持缓解时间延长,但生存率仅略有提高。与CAF方案相比,在CAF方案基础上加用一种阶段性活性联合方案CAMELEON(即序贯交替治疗),并未改善肝转移、淋巴管炎和结节性肺转移患者的疾病控制时间和生存率。对晚期疾病患者采用积极的联合化疗方法可提供更好、更长时间的疾病和肿瘤控制,但对总生存率仅略有改善。在最大耐受方案中添加其他药物并未改善治疗效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验