Tsuchida T, Iijima M, Fujiwara H, Pehamberger H, Shearer G M, Katz S I
J Immunol. 1984 Mar;132(3):1163-8.
In this study, we determined whether Langerhans cells (LC) can function as both stimulatory and accessory cells (ACC) in alloreactive and syngeneic modified CTL induction in vitro. LC exhibited potent Ia+ stimulatory function, comparable to spleen cells, in both allo-CTL induction and in TNP-modified CTL induction assays. In contrast to spleen cells, however, when LC were syngeneic to the responders in an Ia+-adherent cell-depleted CTL culture, they could not restore the CTL responses. This was due, in part, to the suppression of CTL induction, presumably via secretion of prostaglandin E by epidermal cells (EC), because addition of indomethacin reversed the suppression. Even in the presence of indomethacin, however, LC were unable to exhibit ACC function. Finally, we tested the possibility that both Ia+ and Ia- cells were required to fulfill ACC functions. However, when spleen cells treated with anti-Ia antibody and complement and EC and indomethacin were added to an Ia+-adherent cell-depleted CTL culture, there was no significant restoration of the CTL response. Thus, LC can clearly act as Ia+ stimulatory cells in CTL induction but cannot serve as ACC in CTL induction, whereas Ia+ spleen cells may subserve both functions. These data suggest a functional heterogeneity of Ia+ antigen-presenting cells in spleen and in epidermis.
在本研究中,我们确定了朗格汉斯细胞(LC)在体外同种异体反应性和同基因修饰的细胞毒性T淋巴细胞(CTL)诱导过程中是否既能作为刺激细胞又能作为辅助细胞(ACC)发挥作用。在同种异体CTL诱导和三硝基苯(TNP)修饰的CTL诱导试验中,LC均表现出与脾细胞相当的强大的Ia⁺刺激功能。然而,与脾细胞不同的是,在Ia⁺黏附细胞耗竭的CTL培养中,当LC与应答者同基因时,它们无法恢复CTL反应。这部分是由于表皮细胞(EC)可能通过分泌前列腺素E抑制CTL诱导,因为添加吲哚美辛可逆转这种抑制作用。然而,即使存在吲哚美辛,LC也无法发挥ACC功能。最后,我们测试了同时需要Ia⁺和Ia⁻细胞来发挥ACC功能的可能性。然而,当用抗Ia抗体和补体处理的脾细胞以及EC和吲哚美辛添加到Ia⁺黏附细胞耗竭的CTL培养中时,CTL反应没有明显恢复。因此,LC在CTL诱导中显然可以作为Ia⁺刺激细胞,但不能作为CTL诱导中的ACC,而Ia⁺脾细胞可能兼具这两种功能。这些数据表明脾和表皮中Ia⁺抗原呈递细胞存在功能异质性。