Suppr超能文献

报告的视觉表象与认知表现中的个体差异。

Individual differences in reported visual imagery and cognitive performance.

作者信息

McKelvie S J, Rohrberg M M

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1978 Apr;46(2):451-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.46.2.451.

Abstract

Selected on the basis of their scores on the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire, 16 High Visualizers and 14 Low Visualizers (equally divided by sex) completed various cognitive tasks thought to involve visual (Space Relations, Watch Rotation) and non-visual (Verbal Reasoning, Abstract Reasoning, Numerical Ability) processes. Although Low Visualizers (particularly males) were superior to High Visualizers in Numerical Ability, both groups performed equally well on the other tests. Since correlational analyses indicated that scores on the vividness questionnaire and the Gordon Controllability of Imagery Questionnaire were not independent, particularly for females, it was suggested that questionnaires ought to be developed better to differentiate the abilities to generate and control visual images.

摘要

根据他们在视觉意象生动性问卷上的得分,挑选出16名高视觉想象者和14名低视觉想象者(按性别平均分配),他们完成了各种被认为涉及视觉(空间关系、手表旋转)和非视觉(语言推理、抽象推理、数字能力)过程的认知任务。尽管低视觉想象者(尤其是男性)在数字能力方面优于高视觉想象者,但两组在其他测试中的表现同样出色。由于相关分析表明,生动性问卷得分与戈登意象可控性问卷得分并非独立,尤其是对女性而言,因此建议应更好地开发问卷,以区分生成和控制视觉意象的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验