van Leeuwen F E, de Vet H C, Hayes R B, van Staveren W A, West C E, Hautvast J G
Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Nov;118(5):752-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113686.
The relative validity of a method for determining dietary intake four years previously was assessed. In May 1981, 79 people (46 women and 33 men, aged 29-69 years) were interviewed by use of the dietary history method concerning dietary intake in 1977. These results were compared with those obtained in this same group by means of a seven-day record in February 1977. For daily intake of energy and selected nutrients, the differences in mean intake were generally below 10%, while for six examined food groups, larger differences in the median estimates were noted. The results provide evidence that retrospectively collected dietary data have some meaningfulness, although questions remain concerning whether the retrospective dietary history method is sufficiently valid for use in a particular epidemiologic study.
对一种用于确定四年前饮食摄入量的方法的相对有效性进行了评估。1981年5月,采用饮食史方法对79人(46名女性和33名男性,年龄在29至69岁之间)进行了访谈,询问他们1977年的饮食摄入量。将这些结果与该组在1977年2月通过七天记录获得的结果进行比较。对于能量和选定营养素的每日摄入量,平均摄入量的差异一般低于10%,而对于六个被检查的食物组,中位数估计值的差异更大。结果表明,回顾性收集的饮食数据具有一定意义,尽管对于回顾性饮食史方法在特定流行病学研究中是否足够有效仍存在疑问。