Suppr超能文献

用于流行病学研究的饮食史问卷评估。

Evaluation of a diet history questionnaire for epidemiologic studies.

作者信息

Jain M, Howe G R, Johnson K C, Miller A B

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Feb;111(2):212-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112888.

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate a detailed diet history questionnaire. Diet histories obtained from 16 men were compared with food records kept by their partners for a 30-day period. Mean estimates for all 13 nutrients calculated were higher with the diet history than with food records. Positive correlation coefficients were found between estimates from the two methods for all nutrients as well as food groups and six of the 13 nutrients gave a good fit for the corresponding regression equations. The questionnaire was also evaluated by repeating it after six months on 26 case-control pairs of an ongoing diet and cancer study. High correlation coefficients were obtained for most nutrients for the controls. However, cases showed lower correlations probably due to changes in their diet. The study found that the diet history method as an estimate of dietary patterns among groups shows sufficient validity and reliability to make it a useful instrument for epidemiologic studies.

摘要

本研究旨在评估一份详细的饮食史问卷。从16名男性那里获得的饮食史与他们的伴侣记录的30天食物记录进行了比较。计算得出的所有13种营养素的平均估计值,饮食史法高于食物记录法。两种方法对所有营养素以及食物组的估计值之间均发现了正相关系数,并且13种营养素中的6种与相应的回归方程拟合良好。在一项正在进行的饮食与癌症研究中的26对病例对照者在6个月后再次填写该问卷,以此对问卷进行评估。对照组大多数营养素的相关系数较高。然而,病例组的相关性较低,可能是由于他们饮食的变化。该研究发现,饮食史法作为群体饮食模式的一种估计方法,显示出足够的有效性和可靠性,使其成为流行病学研究的一种有用工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验