• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority: court-ordered surgery to protect the life of an unborn child.

作者信息

Finamore E P

出版信息

Am J Law Med. 1983 Spring;9(1):83-101.

PMID:6638020
Abstract

In Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed a lower court order requiring a pregnant woman to submit to a cesarian section and other medical procedures necessary to save her unborn child's life. The court found that the state's interest in protecting the viable fetus outweighed the pregnant mother's right to religious practice, right to refuse medical treatment, and parental autonomy. Jefferson appears to stand for the proposition that fetuses have rights that attach at viability and that mothers have a corresponding duty to ensure live births. The decision foreshadows substantial conflict between fetal and maternal rights.

摘要

相似文献

1
Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority: court-ordered surgery to protect the life of an unborn child.
Am J Law Med. 1983 Spring;9(1):83-101.
2
Court-ordered surgery for the protection of a viable fetus: Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority, 247 Ga. 86, 274 S.E.2d 457 (1981).
West New Engl Law Rev. 1982 Summer;5(1):125-48.
3
Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority.杰斐逊诉格里芬·斯伯丁县医院管理局案
South East Report Second Ser. 1981 Feb 3;274:457-62.
4
The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
Albany Law J Sci Technol. 1994;4(2):229-309.
5
Toward guidelines for compelling cesarean surgery: of rights, responsibility, and decisional authenticity.
Minn Law Rev. 1991 Dec;76(2):239-94.
6
Mother v. her unborn child: where should Texas draw the line?母亲诉其未出生胎儿:得克萨斯州应如何划定界限?
Houst Law Rev. 1987 May;24(3):549-76.
7
Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
North Carol Law Rev. 1991 Nov;70(1):297-321.
8
Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.抵制将医疗建议转化为司法命令的诱惑:对孕妇法院强制手术的重新审视。
Ga State Univ Law Rev. 1994 May;10(4):615-89.
9
Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.当代跨大西洋地区有关强制孕妇接受医学治疗的发展情况。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 May;35(2):132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb01855.x.
10
A new threat to pregnant women's autonomy.对孕妇自主权的新威胁。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1987 Aug-Sep;17(4):33-40.