Campos E C, Chiesi C
Doc Ophthalmol. 1983 Sep 30;55(4):277-93. doi: 10.1007/BF00161285.
Campos (1982a) reported on his psychophysical studies on the binocularity of patients with comitant strabismus. With binocular visual field techniques, it was possible to show that patients with small-angle eso- and exotropia exhibit a binocular vision, without suppression of the deviated eye. In the present paper visual electrophysiology is used objectively these findings and to provide more insight in the problem. First, the studies on binocularity in normals and strabismics, done by using visual evoked responses (VER) are reviewed. This type of investigation is relatively new and the results of the literature are still conflicting. Then personal results of the authors are reported. It is shown that with VER it is possible to objectively assess the presence of anomalous binocular vision (ABV) sustained by anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC) in small-angle strabismus. In patients with large angle deviations this type of binocularity is absent. A correlation between psychophysical and electrophysiological data is provided. Lastly a simple method is described for differentiating the binocularity of normals from that of Strabismics with ARC. This method is based on the recording of binocular VER with the anteposition in front of the fixing eye of neutral filters of increasing density.
坎波斯(1982a)报告了他对共同性斜视患者双眼视的心理物理学研究。通过双眼视野技术,可以证明小角度内斜视和外斜视患者具有双眼视觉,未出现偏斜眼的抑制现象。在本文中,视觉电生理学被用于客观验证这些发现,并为该问题提供更多见解。首先,回顾了通过视觉诱发电位(VER)对正常人和斜视患者双眼视的研究。这类研究相对较新,文献结果仍存在矛盾。然后报告了作者的个人研究结果。结果表明,通过VER可以客观评估小角度斜视中由异常视网膜对应(ARC)维持的异常双眼视觉(ABV)的存在。在大角度偏斜的患者中不存在这种双眼视。提供了心理物理学和电生理学数据之间的相关性。最后描述了一种简单的方法,用于区分正常人与患有ARC的斜视患者的双眼视。该方法基于在注视眼前放置密度逐渐增加的中性滤光片时记录双眼VER。