Suppr超能文献

主动脉内球囊的手术切除与经皮切除

Surgical versus percutaneous removal of the intra-aortic balloon.

作者信息

Cutler B S, Okike O N, Vander Salm T J

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983 Dec;86(6):907-11.

PMID:6645593
Abstract

In order to determine the best method for removal of the percutaneous intra-aortic balloon (IAB), we divided 38 patients into two groups. The IAB was removed percutaneously in Group I and surgically in Group II. There were two hemorrhagic and four thrombotic complications sufficiently severe to necessitate vascular surgical intervention in Group I. There were no vascular complications in Group II (p less than 0.1). Among the 19 patients in Group II, eight were found to have acute thrombosis of the superficial or deep femoral artery at the time of operation. It is concluded that thrombus development at the site of IAB insertion is a common event and often leads to acute ischemia. Surgical removal of a percutaneously placed IAB is recommended because it provides an opportunity for the detection and removal of thrombotic material, as well as careful closure of the puncture site.

摘要

为确定移除经皮主动脉内球囊(IAB)的最佳方法,我们将38例患者分为两组。第一组经皮移除IAB,第二组通过手术移除。第一组有2例出血并发症和4例血栓形成并发症严重到需要血管外科干预。第二组无血管并发症(p<0.1)。在第二组的19例患者中,8例在手术时被发现有股浅动脉或股深动脉急性血栓形成。得出的结论是,IAB置入部位血栓形成是常见事件,常导致急性缺血。建议手术移除经皮放置的IAB,因为这为检测和清除血栓物质以及仔细闭合穿刺部位提供了机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验