Suppr超能文献

精神科治疗。加利福尼亚州近期法庭判决的一般影响及经验教训。

Psychiatric treatment. General implications and lessons from recent court decisions in California.

作者信息

Rudin E, Zimmerman R

出版信息

West J Med. 1978 May;128(5):459-66.

Abstract

The California legislature enacted tight constraints on the use of psychosurgery and electroconvulsive therapy in 1974. In April 1976 a State Court of Appeals declared part of the law to be unconstitutional. In doing so, the court enunciated several principles for regulating medical procedures. It affirmed the inherent police powers which permit the state to safeguard the public, especially incompetent, involuntary or confined persons, with respect to intrusive and hazardous medical procedures and to procedures which affect thought or feeling. Although limited to legislation concerning two psychiatric procedures, the court's decision, and subsequently enacted legislation governing these procedures, has implications for other medical procedures and for other parts of the nation.

摘要

1974年,加利福尼亚州立法机构对精神外科手术和电休克疗法的使用实施了严格限制。1976年4月,一家州上诉法院宣布该法律的部分内容违宪。在此过程中,法院阐明了几项规范医疗程序的原则。它确认了固有的治安权,这些权力允许国家在侵入性和危险性医疗程序以及影响思想或情感的程序方面保护公众,特别是无行为能力、非自愿或被监禁的人。尽管仅限于有关两种精神科程序的立法,但法院的裁决以及随后颁布的管理这些程序的立法,对其他医疗程序和美国其他地区都有影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验