Suppr超能文献

吸入性与口服沙丁胺醇对支气管哮喘的支气管扩张作用

Bronchodilatory effect of inhaled versus oral salbutamol in bronchial asthma.

作者信息

Louridas G, Kakoura M, Galanis N, Patakas D, Kastritsi K

出版信息

Respiration. 1983;44(6):439-43. doi: 10.1159/000194582.

Abstract

The bronchodilator effect of salbutamol inhalation was compared with the oral administration of the drug in 10 patients with bronchial asthma. The study consisted of treating each patient for 4 consecutive days with: (1) a combined regimen consisting of a 2-mg tablet of salbutamol and 10 puffs of salbutamol inhalation (100 micrograms in each puff) given in pairs of two puffs every 20 min (regimen 1); (2) salbutamol inhalation (regimen 2); (3) salbutamol tablet (regimen 3), and (4) placebo, tablet and inhalation (regimen 4). The bronchodilator effect was assessed measuring the forced expiratory volume in 1 s, the forced vital capacity and the peak expiratory flow rate. The bronchodilator response was significantly greater on the inhalation alone and the combined regimen than on the oral and placebo regimens. The combined regimen showed a better although not significant bronchodilatory response than the inhalation regimen. We conclude that the inhalation treatment with salbutamol is superior to the oral route of administration in treating bronchial asthma and that the oral treatment has an added effect.

摘要

对10例支气管哮喘患者吸入沙丁胺醇与口服该药物的支气管扩张作用进行了比较。该研究包括对每位患者连续4天进行如下治疗:(1)联合治疗方案,即每20分钟给予2次沙丁胺醇2毫克片剂和10喷沙丁胺醇吸入剂(每喷100微克)(方案1);(2)沙丁胺醇吸入治疗(方案2);(3)沙丁胺醇片剂治疗(方案3);(4)安慰剂片剂和吸入剂治疗(方案4)。通过测量1秒用力呼气容积、用力肺活量和呼气峰值流速来评估支气管扩张作用。单独吸入治疗和联合治疗方案的支气管扩张反应明显大于口服和安慰剂治疗方案。联合治疗方案的支气管扩张反应虽不如吸入治疗方案显著,但效果更好。我们得出结论,在治疗支气管哮喘方面,吸入沙丁胺醇治疗优于口服给药途径,且口服治疗有附加作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验