[Qualitative and quantitative analysis of regional contraction disorders using levocardiograms].

In 74 patients with proven myocardial infarction (typical history and enzymes, diagnostic ECG, and stenosis of the vessel supplying the asynergic region of more than 75%) the results of qualitative analysis of left ventricular cineangiograms were compared to those of quantitative analysis using the radial axis method of Mathes. There was a significant difference in interpretation between the two methods if the physiological movements of the heart were not taken into account in the qualitative analysis. After correction for systolic anterior movement and downward movement of the aortic valve during systole, a mean accuracy of 92% resulted. The radial axis method discriminated well between normokinetic and asynergic wall segments. However, this method proved less useful for the detection of asynergies in the apical, anterobasal, and posterobasal regions. A radial axis angle of between 15 degrees and 20 degrees is considered to be optimal. The quantitative analysis seems to be particularly useful for the interpretation of borderline cases, and should be carried out routinely in addition to the qualitative analysis.